Ideological symmetry in out-group bias: a neuroimaging study in the context of vaccine hesitancy

One of the most contentious debates in political psychology relates to the existence of ideological (a)symmetry in out-group bias. Recent neuroimaging and psychological studies circumvented previous criticisms regarding the inclusion of ideologically biased out-groups by directly targeting the ideological out-groups themselves (rightists for leftists and leftists for rightists). Their findings confirmed the asymmetry claim, with particularly robust and informative results at the neural level. Nevertheless, the recent pandemic provided a new opportunity for the investigation of ideological (a)symmetry in out-group bias by introducing an ideologically neutral yet highly discriminated and stigmatized group—vaccine-hesitant individuals. In this preregistered study, 50 Finnish adults were scanned using magnetoencephalography to delineate function-specific neural mechanisms of bias against vaccine hesitancy. The results show a clear neural bias against vaccine hesitancy regardless of political inclination. The findings reported here contribute to the present debate by selecting a unique ideologically neutral target and revealing that ideological (a)symmetries in out-group bias are highly context-dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Social Psychology
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1447842
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ideological symmetry in out-group bias: a neuroimaging study in the context of vaccine hesitancy

Annika Kluge, Jonathan Lévy
Frontiers in Social Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Ideological symmetry in out-group bias: a neuroimaging study in the context of vaccine hesitancy

Annika Kluge, Jonathan Lévy
article en

Abstract

One of the most contentious debates in political psychology relates to the existence of ideological (a)symmetry in out-group bias. Recent neuroimaging and psychological studies circumvented previous criticisms regarding the inclusion of ideologically biased out-groups by directly targeting the ideological out-groups themselves (rightists for leftists and leftists for rightists). Their findings confirmed the asymmetry claim, with particularly robust and informative results at the neural level. Nevertheless, the recent pandemic provided a new opportunity for the investigation of ideological (a)symmetry in out-group bias by introducing an ideologically neutral yet highly discriminated and stigmatized group—vaccine-hesitant individuals. In this preregistered study, 50 Finnish adults were scanned using magnetoencephalography to delineate function-specific neural mechanisms of bias against vaccine hesitancy. The results show a clear neural bias against vaccine hesitancy regardless of political inclination. The findings reported here contribute to the present debate by selecting a unique ideologically neutral target and revealing that ideological (a)symmetries in out-group bias are highly context-dependent.

Frontiers in Social PsychologyVol. 2
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Aalto University (FI)
Academy of Finland
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.