Preparing educators for the digital age: teacher perceptions of active teaching methods and digital integration

Introduction This study investigates higher education teachers’ perceptions of active teaching methods—Case-Based Learning (CBL), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), and Team-Based Learning (TBL)—and their integration with digital technologies. These pedagogical strategies are crucial for fostering critical thinking, collaboration, and problem-solving skills among students, especially in the digital age. Despite their benefits, challenges such as resource limitations, time constraints, and insufficient training hinder their implementation. Methods A mixed-methods approach was adopted, involving 104 educators from various higher education institutions in Kazakhstan. Participants underwent an eight-week training program consisting of 72 h of workshops, collaborative activities, and self-paced learning. Pre- and post-training assessments measured knowledge, confidence, and practical application of active teaching methods. Surveys, feedback sessions, and peer evaluations provided qualitative and quantitative insights into participants’ experiences and challenges. Results The training program significantly improved participants’ knowledge, confidence, and ability to implement CBL, PBL, and TBL. Post-training assessments showed a 4.2-point increase in confidence and practical application scores. Most educators (66.35%) reported moderate adaptability of these methods to their current educational programs, while 27.88% achieved high adaptability. Participants identified resource limitations (43.27%) and time constraints (33.65%) as key challenges. Problem-Based Learning (PBL) was preferred for fostering critical thinking and problem-solving, with a majority (51.92%) favoring it over other methods. Digital technologies, such as Moodle and augmented reality tools, enhanced teaching effectiveness and student engagement. Discussion The findings highlight the transformative potential of active teaching methods and digital integration in higher education. Educators across various academic positions and institutions perceived these methods as highly effective, aligning with the Diffusion of Innovations Theory. Challenges such as insufficient resources and curriculum misalignment were significant barriers to broader adoption. Continuous professional development, institutional support, and strategic resource allocation are crucial for optimizing these methods’ impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1473766
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing educators for the digital age: teacher perceptions of active teaching methods and digital integration

Elmira Abdykerimova, Dariya Abykenova, Kaussar Mukhtarkyzy, Almagul Assainova et al.
14 citations
Frontiers in Education
Online and Blended Learning
29.34
article

Preparing educators for the digital age: teacher perceptions of active teaching methods and digital integration

Elmira Abdykerimova, Dariya Abykenova, Kaussar Mukhtarkyzy, Almagul Assainova, Gulmira Abildinova
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Introduction This study investigates higher education teachers’ perceptions of active teaching methods—Case-Based Learning (CBL), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), and Team-Based Learning (TBL)—and their integration with digital technologies. These pedagogical strategies are crucial for fostering critical thinking, collaboration, and problem-solving skills among students, especially in the digital age. Despite their benefits, challenges such as resource limitations, time constraints, and insufficient training hinder their implementation. Methods A mixed-methods approach was adopted, involving 104 educators from various higher education institutions in Kazakhstan. Participants underwent an eight-week training program consisting of 72 h of workshops, collaborative activities, and self-paced learning. Pre- and post-training assessments measured knowledge, confidence, and practical application of active teaching methods. Surveys, feedback sessions, and peer evaluations provided qualitative and quantitative insights into participants’ experiences and challenges. Results The training program significantly improved participants’ knowledge, confidence, and ability to implement CBL, PBL, and TBL. Post-training assessments showed a 4.2-point increase in confidence and practical application scores. Most educators (66.35%) reported moderate adaptability of these methods to their current educational programs, while 27.88% achieved high adaptability. Participants identified resource limitations (43.27%) and time constraints (33.65%) as key challenges. Problem-Based Learning (PBL) was preferred for fostering critical thinking and problem-solving, with a majority (51.92%) favoring it over other methods. Digital technologies, such as Moodle and augmented reality tools, enhanced teaching effectiveness and student engagement. Discussion The findings highlight the transformative potential of active teaching methods and digital integration in higher education. Educators across various academic positions and institutions perceived these methods as highly effective, aligning with the Diffusion of Innovations Theory. Challenges such as insufficient resources and curriculum misalignment were significant barriers to broader adoption. Continuous professional development, institutional support, and strategic resource allocation are crucial for optimizing these methods’ impact.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 9
L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University (KZ), Pavlodar State Pedagogical University (KZ), Caspian University (KZ), Kazakh Technology and Business University named after K.Kulazhanov (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Online and Blended Learning
29.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.