The diverse star formation histories of early massive, quenched galaxies in modern galaxy formation simulations

ABSTRACT We present a comprehensive study of the star formation histories of massive-quenched galaxies at $z=3$ in three semi-analytical models (Shark, gaea, Galform) and three cosmological hydrodynamical simulations (Eagle, IllustrisTNG, Simba). We study the predicted number density and stellar mass function of massive-quenched galaxies, their formation and quenching time-scales and star formation properties of their progenitors. Predictions are disparate in all these diagnostics, for instance: (i) some simulations reproduce the observed number density of very massive-quenched galaxies ($\gt 10^{11}\, \rm {\rm M}_{\odot }$) but underpredict the high density of intermediate-mass ones, while others fit well the lower masses but underpredict the higher ones; (ii) in most simulations, except for gaea and Eagle, most massive-quenched galaxies had starburst periods, with the most intense ones happening at $4\lt z\lt 5$; however, only in Shark and IllustrisTNG we do find a large number of progenitors with star formation rates $\gt 300\rm \, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, yr^{-1}$; (iii) quenching time-scales are in the range $\approx 20\!-\!150$ Myr depending on the simulation; among other differences. These disparate predictions can be tied to the adopted active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback model. For instance, the explicit black hole (BH) mass dependence to trigger the ‘radio mode’ in IllustrisTNG and Simba makes it difficult to produce quenched galaxies with intermediate stellar masses, also leading to higher baryon collapse efficiencies ($\approx 15\!-\!30$ per cent); while the strong bolometric luminosity dependence of the AGN outflow rate in gaea leads to BHs of modest mass quenching galaxies. Current observations are unable to distinguish between these different predictions due to the small sample sizes. However, these predictions are testable with current facilities and upcoming observations, allowing a ‘true physics experiment’ to be carried out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2626
Citations
30
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The diverse star formation histories of early massive, quenched galaxies in modern galaxy formation simulations

Francesco Valentino, C. M. Baugh, Karl Glazebrook, Fabio Fontanot et al.
30 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
15.19
article

The diverse star formation histories of early massive, quenched galaxies in modern galaxy formation simulations

Francesco Valentino, C. M. Baugh, Karl Glazebrook, Fabio Fontanot, Ruby J. Wright, Harry George Chittenden, Themiya Nanayakkara, K. E. Harborne, Lizhi Xie, Claudia del P. Lagos, Matías Bravo, A. S. G. Robotham, Anna de Graaff, Michaela Hirschmann, Ángel Chandro-Gómez
article en
30 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present a comprehensive study of the star formation histories of massive-quenched galaxies at $z=3$ in three semi-analytical models (Shark, gaea, Galform) and three cosmological hydrodynamical simulations (Eagle, IllustrisTNG, Simba). We study the predicted number density and stellar mass function of massive-quenched galaxies, their formation and quenching time-scales and star formation properties of their progenitors. Predictions are disparate in all these diagnostics, for instance: (i) some simulations reproduce the observed number density of very massive-quenched galaxies ($\gt 10^{11}\, \rm {\rm M}_{\odot }$) but underpredict the high density of intermediate-mass ones, while others fit well the lower masses but underpredict the higher ones; (ii) in most simulations, except for gaea and Eagle, most massive-quenched galaxies had starburst periods, with the most intense ones happening at $4\lt z\lt 5$; however, only in Shark and IllustrisTNG we do find a large number of progenitors with star formation rates $\gt 300\rm \, {\rm M}_{\odot }\, yr^{-1}$; (iii) quenching time-scales are in the range $\approx 20\!-\!150$ Myr depending on the simulation; among other differences. These disparate predictions can be tied to the adopted active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback model. For instance, the explicit black hole (BH) mass dependence to trigger the ‘radio mode’ in IllustrisTNG and Simba makes it difficult to produce quenched galaxies with intermediate stellar masses, also leading to higher baryon collapse efficiencies ($\approx 15\!-\!30$ per cent); while the strong bolometric luminosity dependence of the AGN outflow rate in gaea leads to BHs of modest mass quenching galaxies. Current observations are unable to distinguish between these different predictions due to the small sample sizes. However, these predictions are testable with current facilities and upcoming observations, allowing a ‘true physics experiment’ to be carried out.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 536(3)
European Southern Observatory (DE), University of Helsinki (FI), Tianjin Normal University (CN), The University of Western Australia (AU), Durham University (GB), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI), Trieste Astronomical Observatory (IT), Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE), DAWN Center for Independent Living (US), Fundación Botín (ES), ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (AU), International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (AU), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), McMaster University (CA)
McMaster University, Australian Government, Government of Western Australia, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Australian Research Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
15.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.