Do we need group and save for trans-urethral resection of bladder tumour and trans-urethral resection of the prostate procedures?
Background: Trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and trans-urethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) are urological procedures essential for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, respectively, these procedures may result in post-operative bleeding. In our hospital, pre-operative blood group and save is a routine to enhance patient safety. This study aims to evaluate transfusion rates and the potential cost benefits of limiting routine blood group and save. Methods: We conducted a retrospective audit of patients undergoing TURP and TURBT between October 2018 and October 2020. Data was collected using theatre system records and blood bank information regarding transfusions. Results: Out of 233 patients (average age 74), 141 underwent TURBT, 89 underwent TURP, and 3 underwent both simultaneously. Historical group and save were found in 214 (91.84%) patients, and 162 (69.5%) had same-day group and save. Only 2 patients (0.85%) necessitated transfusions. Conclusions: The necessity for blood transfusion after TURP and TURBT is low, indicating that routine pre-operative group and save may not be essential for all patients. Tailoring this practice to high-risk individuals may reduce costs and relieve workloads. Enhanced surgical techniques and tools are likely contributors to these improved outcomes.
Authors
- Mudassir Wani
- Mohammed Sheikh
- A. Hamed
- Hasan A Al-Ibraheem
Institutions
- Swansea Bay University Health Board (GB)
- Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (GB)
- Medway NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Surgery Journal
- Published
- 2024-11-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20243533
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.42