Comparative Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Surgical Measurements of Periodontal Bone Defects in Periodontitis Patients: An In Vivo Study
Overlapping and the absence of 3D information are two of traditional radiography's main drawbacks. Surgerical exposure can yield precise information, but it gives less time to plan the kind of periodontal regeneration that will be needed. The accuracy and feasibility of CBCT have been established. How to cite this article: Alzahrani E, Soman C, Alasqah M, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Surgical Measurements of Periodontal Bone Defects in Periodontitis Patients: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(8):772-777.
Authors
- Cristalle Soman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-8574)
- Khalid Gufran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9623-559X)
- Mohammed Alasqah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2519-6578)
- Emad Alzahrani
Institutions
- Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA)
- Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA)
- Riyadh Elm University (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
- Published
- 2024-11-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3677
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.48