Making soil carbon credits work for climate change mitigation

In 2023, the Australian Government issued ∼250,000 soil carbon credits following a measurement period characterised by high rainfall (Decile 10). The inferred soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates during this period, ranging from ∼2 to 8 t C ha<sup>−</sup>¹ yr<sup>−</sup>¹, significantly exceed rates reported in Australian scientific studies (∼0.1 to 1.2 t C ha<sup>−</sup>¹ yr<sup>−</sup>¹). Our analysis, incorporating SOC and biomass measurements alongside remote sensing of NDVI, reveals that these SOC gains were largely attributable to above-average rainfall rather than project interventions. Moreover, these gains were not sustained when rainfall returned to average levels, raising concerns about the durability of credited sequestration and its additionality beyond natural climatic variability. Our findings demonstrate that current safeguards within the Soil Carbon Method—such as withholding 25% of credits during the first measurement period—are likely insufficient to account for climatic variability. To strengthen the integrity of the carbon crediting system, we recommend extending the minimum measurement period for credit issuance to at least five years. Additionally, governments should establish science-based ‘reasonable bounds’ for expected long-term SOC gains from management practices to sense-check reported outcomes. These measures will ensure that credited SOC sequestration is more closely tied to management-driven outcomes rather than short-term climate-driven fluctuations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Management
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2024.2430780
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making soil carbon credits work for climate change mitigation

Elaine Mitchell, Felicity Deane, Susan Orgill, Annette Cowie et al.
20 citations
Carbon Management
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
6.67
article

Making soil carbon credits work for climate change mitigation

Elaine Mitchell, Felicity Deane, Susan Orgill, Annette Cowie, David Rowlings, Aaron Simmons, Brian Wilson, Laura A. Grace, Sahar Ahmadi, Warwick Badgery, Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel, David J. Pannell, Matthew Tom Harrison, Naoya Takeda, Richard Eckard, William J. Parton, Paige L. Stanley, Peter Grace, Ken Day
article en
20 citations

Abstract

In 2023, the Australian Government issued ∼250,000 soil carbon credits following a measurement period characterised by high rainfall (Decile 10). The inferred soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates during this period, ranging from ∼2 to 8 t C ha<sup>−</sup>¹ yr<sup>−</sup>¹, significantly exceed rates reported in Australian scientific studies (∼0.1 to 1.2 t C ha<sup>−</sup>¹ yr<sup>−</sup>¹). Our analysis, incorporating SOC and biomass measurements alongside remote sensing of NDVI, reveals that these SOC gains were largely attributable to above-average rainfall rather than project interventions. Moreover, these gains were not sustained when rainfall returned to average levels, raising concerns about the durability of credited sequestration and its additionality beyond natural climatic variability. Our findings demonstrate that current safeguards within the Soil Carbon Method—such as withholding 25% of credits during the first measurement period—are likely insufficient to account for climatic variability. To strengthen the integrity of the carbon crediting system, we recommend extending the minimum measurement period for credit issuance to at least five years. Additionally, governments should establish science-based ‘reasonable bounds’ for expected long-term SOC gains from management practices to sense-check reported outcomes. These measures will ensure that credited SOC sequestration is more closely tied to management-driven outcomes rather than short-term climate-driven fluctuations.

Carbon ManagementVol. 15(1)
University of Tasmania (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), University of New England (AU), Colorado State University (US)
Meat and Livestock Australia
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
6.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.