How to establish and sustain a disease registry: insights from a qualitative study of six disease registries in the UK

We identified six key considerations when establishing a sustainable disease registry: (1) include a diverse set of stakeholders; (2) involve patients at every stage; (3) collect a core data set for all participants; (4) ensure the data system is flexible and interoperable with the wider data landscape; (5) anticipate changing data needs over time; and (6) identify financial opportunities to sustain the registry's activities for the long term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02775-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to establish and sustain a disease registry: insights from a qualitative study of six disease registries in the UK

Edmund Stubbs, Raphael Wittenberg, Nicholas Mays, Josephine Exley
5 citations
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
5.65
article

How to establish and sustain a disease registry: insights from a qualitative study of six disease registries in the UK

Edmund Stubbs, Raphael Wittenberg, Nicholas Mays, Josephine Exley
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We identified six key considerations when establishing a sustainable disease registry: (1) include a diverse set of stakeholders; (2) involve patients at every stage; (3) collect a core data set for all participants; (4) ensure the data system is flexible and interoperable with the wider data landscape; (5) anticipate changing data needs over time; and (6) identify financial opportunities to sustain the registry's activities for the long term.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingVol. 24(1)
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.