Does Algorithmic Trading Induce Herding?

ABSTRACT Algorithmic trading (AT) plays a major role in the trading activities of developed markets. This research breaks new ground by investigating how AT influences herding behaviour in stock markets. Utilising the implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), we show that AT‐induced herding is quantitatively 14 times more pronounced compared to herding triggered by non‐AT elements. Algorithmic traders herd more when international volatility and market uncertainty are high, revealing a heightened sensitivity to global market signals. However, during periods of high local volatility, AT seems to disregard these fluctuations, indicating an ‘inattention effect’. AT‐induced anti‐herding is prominent in the volatile aggressive stocks, while no such behaviour is observed in the more stable defensive stocks. The findings carry critical implications for both regulators and market professionals, as we uncover dual behaviours of AT‐induced herding and anti‐herding in varying market conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3085
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Algorithmic Trading Induce Herding?

Vasileios Pappas, Emmanouil Skarmeas, Thanos Verousis, Christos Alexakis et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
0.54
article

Does Algorithmic Trading Induce Herding?

Vasileios Pappas, Emmanouil Skarmeas, Thanos Verousis, Christos Alexakis, Servanna Mianjun Fu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Algorithmic trading (AT) plays a major role in the trading activities of developed markets. This research breaks new ground by investigating how AT influences herding behaviour in stock markets. Utilising the implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), we show that AT‐induced herding is quantitatively 14 times more pronounced compared to herding triggered by non‐AT elements. Algorithmic traders herd more when international volatility and market uncertainty are high, revealing a heightened sensitivity to global market signals. However, during periods of high local volatility, AT seems to disregard these fluctuations, indicating an ‘inattention effect’. AT‐induced anti‐herding is prominent in the volatile aggressive stocks, while no such behaviour is observed in the more stable defensive stocks. The findings carry critical implications for both regulators and market professionals, as we uncover dual behaviours of AT‐induced herding and anti‐herding in varying market conditions.

International Journal of Finance & EconomicsVol. 31(1)
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Piraeus (GR), Piraeus Bank (GR), University of Surrey (GB), Vlerick Business School (BE), École Supérieure de Commerce de Rennes (FR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.