The role of generative AI in navigating trade-offs in policy research design: balancing validity, rigour, and innovation

This study systematically examines how generative AI can assist in policy research design by analysing methodological trade-offs. Using Claude Pro, we evaluated research designs in 164 articles from leading policy journals across six dimensions: internal, external, construct, and predictive validity, methodological rigour, and conceptual novelty. The analysis demonstrates that AI can effectively identify methodological trade-offs and suggest design improvements within resource constraints, though its utility varies by research type. The findings advance our understanding of AI’s role as a complementary tool in research design while highlighting the critical importance of human expertise in methodological decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Public Policy
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2425874
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of generative AI in navigating trade-offs in policy research design: balancing validity, rigour, and innovation

Xun Wu, 栄利子 仲座, Dale Whittington, Yvonne Jie Chen
2 citations
Journal of Asian Public Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
article

The role of generative AI in navigating trade-offs in policy research design: balancing validity, rigour, and innovation

Xun Wu, 栄利子 仲座, Dale Whittington, Yvonne Jie Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study systematically examines how generative AI can assist in policy research design by analysing methodological trade-offs. Using Claude Pro, we evaluated research designs in 164 articles from leading policy journals across six dimensions: internal, external, construct, and predictive validity, methodological rigour, and conceptual novelty. The analysis demonstrates that AI can effectively identify methodological trade-offs and suggest design improvements within resource constraints, though its utility varies by research type. The findings advance our understanding of AI’s role as a complementary tool in research design while highlighting the critical importance of human expertise in methodological decisions.

Journal of Asian Public PolicyVol. 18(2)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Manchester (GB), ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.