Machine learning for deciphering ore-forming fluid sources using scheelite trace element geochemistry

• Supervised machine learning for scheelite trace element data to identify ore-forming fluids source. • XGBoost and LightGBM demonstrate the best performance in discriminating ore-forming fluid sources by scheelite geochemistry. • Sr, La, Eu, Nb, Pb, Ta, and Mo within scheelite are the key elements for discriminating ore-forming fluid sources. Identifying the source of ore-forming fluids is crucial for constraining ore genesis and guiding exploration. This study introduces a novel approach that leverages the geochemical properties of scheelite and the latest advancements in machine learning algorithms to decipher ore-forming fluid sources. A variety of supervised machine learning methods, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), k-Nearest Neighbors, and Logistic Regression, are employed to identify the source of scheelite ore-forming fluids using high-dimensional information of scheelite trace element data. This study demonstrates that XGBoost (accuracy: 93.5%, AUC: 98.8%) and LightGBM (accuracy: 93.2%, AUC: 98.6%) classifiers efficiently and accurately classify high-dimensional trace element data of metamorphic-hydrothermal and magmatic-hydrothermal scheelite. Interpretation of the models using the SHapley Additive exPlanations tool reveals that Sr, La, Eu, Nb, Pb, Ta, and Mo of scheelite are the most indicative elements for predicting ore-forming fluid sources. Additionally, the discrimination of scheelite data by the XGBoost and LightGBM algorithms suggests that the Darongxi W, Muguayuan W, Yangjiashan Au–Sb–W, and Longshan Au–Sb–W deposits in the Xiangzhong metallogenic province (XZMP, South China) are likely magmatic-related, while the Daping Au, Woxi Au–Sb–W, and Zhazixi Au–Sb–W deposits are likely orogenic. This reveals the complexity of regional Au–Sb–W mineralization in the XZMP. Importantly, this research highlights the untapped potential of integrating scheelite trace element geochemical data with explainable machine learning technology to determine ore-forming fluid sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106374
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for deciphering ore-forming fluid sources using scheelite trace element geochemistry

Yongshun Li, Genshen Cao, Lianjie Zhao, Yu Zhang et al.
9 citations
Ore Geology Reviews
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
3.13
article

Machine learning for deciphering ore-forming fluid sources using scheelite trace element geochemistry

Yongshun Li, Genshen Cao, Lianjie Zhao, Yu Zhang, Mingrui Liu, Hongtao Zhao, Yongjun Shao, Zhangwei Yu
article en
9 citations

Abstract

• Supervised machine learning for scheelite trace element data to identify ore-forming fluids source. • XGBoost and LightGBM demonstrate the best performance in discriminating ore-forming fluid sources by scheelite geochemistry. • Sr, La, Eu, Nb, Pb, Ta, and Mo within scheelite are the key elements for discriminating ore-forming fluid sources. Identifying the source of ore-forming fluids is crucial for constraining ore genesis and guiding exploration. This study introduces a novel approach that leverages the geochemical properties of scheelite and the latest advancements in machine learning algorithms to decipher ore-forming fluid sources. A variety of supervised machine learning methods, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), k-Nearest Neighbors, and Logistic Regression, are employed to identify the source of scheelite ore-forming fluids using high-dimensional information of scheelite trace element data. This study demonstrates that XGBoost (accuracy: 93.5%, AUC: 98.8%) and LightGBM (accuracy: 93.2%, AUC: 98.6%) classifiers efficiently and accurately classify high-dimensional trace element data of metamorphic-hydrothermal and magmatic-hydrothermal scheelite. Interpretation of the models using the SHapley Additive exPlanations tool reveals that Sr, La, Eu, Nb, Pb, Ta, and Mo of scheelite are the most indicative elements for predicting ore-forming fluid sources. Additionally, the discrimination of scheelite data by the XGBoost and LightGBM algorithms suggests that the Darongxi W, Muguayuan W, Yangjiashan Au–Sb–W, and Longshan Au–Sb–W deposits in the Xiangzhong metallogenic province (XZMP, South China) are likely magmatic-related, while the Daping Au, Woxi Au–Sb–W, and Zhazixi Au–Sb–W deposits are likely orogenic. This reveals the complexity of regional Au–Sb–W mineralization in the XZMP. Importantly, this research highlights the untapped potential of integrating scheelite trace element geochemical data with explainable machine learning technology to determine ore-forming fluid sources.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 175
Shandong University of Technology (CN), Central South University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.