Phoretic mites do not affect burying beetle reproductive success, despite eliminating fly competitors

Abstract Interspecific interactions exist along a continuum from parasitism to mutualism, but the fitness costs and benefits of these associations may be fluid, depending on factors like abiotic conditions and interactions with other organisms. Phoretic mites ( Poecilochirus spp.) use burying beetles ( Nicrophorus spp.) as a means of locating and traveling to carrion, the site of both organisms' reproduction. Several species of Dipteran fly also reproduce on carrion, competing with beetles and mites. Mites could benefit their beetle hosts by reducing the abundance of these flies, but experimental evidence of this benefit is mixed. We experimentally tested the fitness effects of Poecilochirus mites on N. orbicollis and determined if these effects are dependent on the presence of fly competitors by experimentally manipulating both fly and mite presence with beetles breeding in a semi‐natural environment. Fly colonisation of carrion reduced beetle reproductive success, and mites reduced fly numbers. Despite this, the fitness cost of flies was not ameliorated by mites. Mites did not affect beetle reproductive success, regardless of fly presence or absence. Although beetle reproductive success was not affected by mites, beetles were physically compromised by high mite loads; beetles with more mites had slower righting times than beetles with fewer mites. Our results suggest that these mites are commensals of burying beetles, although unmeasured benefits of reductions of flies could tip this relationship to a mutualism, and unmeasured fitness costs of compromised locomotion could tip it to parasitism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Entomology
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/een.13405
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phoretic mites do not affect burying beetle reproductive success, despite eliminating fly competitors

Frances Bonier, Laura Nagel, J. F. Kendrick
1 citations
Ecological Entomology
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
0.46
article

Phoretic mites do not affect burying beetle reproductive success, despite eliminating fly competitors

Frances Bonier, Laura Nagel, J. F. Kendrick
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Interspecific interactions exist along a continuum from parasitism to mutualism, but the fitness costs and benefits of these associations may be fluid, depending on factors like abiotic conditions and interactions with other organisms. Phoretic mites ( Poecilochirus spp.) use burying beetles ( Nicrophorus spp.) as a means of locating and traveling to carrion, the site of both organisms' reproduction. Several species of Dipteran fly also reproduce on carrion, competing with beetles and mites. Mites could benefit their beetle hosts by reducing the abundance of these flies, but experimental evidence of this benefit is mixed. We experimentally tested the fitness effects of Poecilochirus mites on N. orbicollis and determined if these effects are dependent on the presence of fly competitors by experimentally manipulating both fly and mite presence with beetles breeding in a semi‐natural environment. Fly colonisation of carrion reduced beetle reproductive success, and mites reduced fly numbers. Despite this, the fitness cost of flies was not ameliorated by mites. Mites did not affect beetle reproductive success, regardless of fly presence or absence. Although beetle reproductive success was not affected by mites, beetles were physically compromised by high mite loads; beetles with more mites had slower righting times than beetles with fewer mites. Our results suggest that these mites are commensals of burying beetles, although unmeasured benefits of reductions of flies could tip this relationship to a mutualism, and unmeasured fitness costs of compromised locomotion could tip it to parasitism.

Ecological EntomologyVol. 50(2)
Queen's University (CA)
Queen's University, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Phoretic mites do not affect burying beetle reproductive success, despite eliminating fly competitors — Frances Bonier, Laura Nagel, et al. · Ecological Entomology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS