The neurophysiology of phonemic contrasts perception in L2/L3 learners: The role of acquisition setting

Abstract Phoneme discrimination is believed to be less accurate in non-native languages compared to native ones. What remains unclear is whether differences in pre-attentive phonological processing emerge between the first foreign language (L2) and additional ones (L3/L n ), and whether they might be influenced by the acquisition setting (formal vs. naturalistic). We conducted an event-related brain potential oddball study with native Polish learners of English (L2) and Norwegian (L3/L n ). The results revealed a graded amplitude of the mismatch negativity (MMN) effect, which was largest in L1, smaller in L2, and smallest in L3/L n . Considering the previously obtained results for naturalistic/mixed learners with the same language combination, we believe that the acquisition setting is an important factor influencing the perception of phonemic contrasts. In the naturalistic group, no difference was observed between L1 and L2, while the instructed group exhibited more fine-grained distinctions between all tested languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s136672892400066x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The neurophysiology of phonemic contrasts perception in L2/L3 learners: The role of acquisition setting

Magdalena Wrembel, Anna Balas, Karolina Rataj, Hanna Kędzierska
2 citations
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Neuroscience and Music Perception
0.69
article

The neurophysiology of phonemic contrasts perception in L2/L3 learners: The role of acquisition setting

Magdalena Wrembel, Anna Balas, Karolina Rataj, Hanna Kędzierska
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Phoneme discrimination is believed to be less accurate in non-native languages compared to native ones. What remains unclear is whether differences in pre-attentive phonological processing emerge between the first foreign language (L2) and additional ones (L3/L n ), and whether they might be influenced by the acquisition setting (formal vs. naturalistic). We conducted an event-related brain potential oddball study with native Polish learners of English (L2) and Norwegian (L3/L n ). The results revealed a graded amplitude of the mismatch negativity (MMN) effect, which was largest in L1, smaller in L2, and smallest in L3/L n . Considering the previously obtained results for naturalistic/mixed learners with the same language combination, we believe that the acquisition setting is an important factor influencing the perception of phonemic contrasts. In the naturalistic group, no difference was observed between L1 and L2, while the instructed group exhibited more fine-grained distinctions between all tested languages.

Bilingualism Language and CognitionVol. 28(2)
University of Wrocław (PL), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.