Produced water sharing: Improved economics and reduced community impact – A Pennsylvania case study

Hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas extraction from unconventional reservoirs is water intensive. Between water sourced for fracturing purposes and water present in rock formations, operators often produce a greater volume of water than oil or gas. Historically, this surplus of produced water has mainly been disposed of via deep injection wells. Rising disposal costs, seasonally limited water availability, and concerns over induced seismicity have incentivized produced water recycling practices, where an operator uses produced water for hydraulic fracturing operations. The logistical challenges associated with produced water recycling have also encouraged operators to adopt ad-hoc water exchange practices, in which competing operators will exchange produced water for mutual cost savings. In this paper, we investigate the potential benefit from systematic produced water exchange among operators in Northeastern Pennsylvania. We leverage PARETO, a free and open-source modeling framework for produced water management optimization, to quantify the benefits of water exchange practices. In an example drawn from FracFocus data, we find that the adoption of systematic water sharing could improve produced water recycling rates from 49.2% to 99%, decreasing operating and trucking costs. • Explore the impact of produced water sharing practices in Northeastern Pennsylvania. • Maximizing water sharing can improve produced water recycling rates up to 99%. • Produced water recycling reduces oil and gas industry sourced water requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213539
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Produced water sharing: Improved economics and reduced community impact – A Pennsylvania case study

Miguel Zamarripa, Markus Drouven, Philip Tominac, Joseph Lee et al.
1 citations
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Water resources management and optimization
0.34
article

Produced water sharing: Improved economics and reduced community impact – A Pennsylvania case study

Miguel Zamarripa, Markus Drouven, Philip Tominac, Joseph Lee, Linlin Yang, Mark A. Layne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas extraction from unconventional reservoirs is water intensive. Between water sourced for fracturing purposes and water present in rock formations, operators often produce a greater volume of water than oil or gas. Historically, this surplus of produced water has mainly been disposed of via deep injection wells. Rising disposal costs, seasonally limited water availability, and concerns over induced seismicity have incentivized produced water recycling practices, where an operator uses produced water for hydraulic fracturing operations. The logistical challenges associated with produced water recycling have also encouraged operators to adopt ad-hoc water exchange practices, in which competing operators will exchange produced water for mutual cost savings. In this paper, we investigate the potential benefit from systematic produced water exchange among operators in Northeastern Pennsylvania. We leverage PARETO, a free and open-source modeling framework for produced water management optimization, to quantify the benefits of water exchange practices. In an example drawn from FracFocus data, we find that the adoption of systematic water sharing could improve produced water recycling rates from 49.2% to 99%, decreasing operating and trucking costs. • Explore the impact of produced water sharing practices in Northeastern Pennsylvania. • Maximizing water sharing can improve produced water recycling rates up to 99%. • Produced water recycling reduces oil and gas industry sourced water requirements.

Geoenergy Science and EngineeringVol. 246
National Energy Technology Laboratory (US), Central Ground Water Board (IN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Water resources management and optimization
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.