Ethical reflections on phase I clinical trials of anticancer drugs: from a Chinese IRB’s empirical perspective

Abstract Purpose With the rapid development of Phase I clinical trials for anticancer drugs in China, addressing ethical concerns is imperative. In order to safeguard the rights, interests, and well-being of research participants, this paper aims to illustrate vital ethical issues that should not be neglected by institutional review boards as well as other relevant stakeholders for Phase I clinical trials of anticancer drugs. Methods This study retrospectively collects documents on Phase I clinical trials for anticancer drugs that were submitted to the Institutional Review Board at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from 2021 to 2023. Based on Chinese and international research regulations and guidelines, these documents, as well as initial and follow-up review resolutions, have been classified and analyzed. Results Given the additional risks of potentially toxic effects in Phase I clinical trials for anticancer drugs and the vulnerability of participants enrolled with advanced cancer status, it is important to review investigator qualifications, preliminary findings, research methods, inclusion and exclusion criteria in the protocol, as well as the validity and readability of informed consent. Additionally, attention should be given to follow-up reviews, particularly regarding safety reports and protocol deviations. Conclusion To effectively protect the rights, interests and safety of research participants. Relevant stakeholders, including sponsors, researchers, and regulatory bodies, should diligently evaluate potential risks and provision contingency plan to minimize the latent risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Holistic Integrative Oncology
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44178-024-00126-4
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical reflections on phase I clinical trials of anticancer drugs: from a Chinese IRB’s empirical perspective

Ji Zhu, Shuting Tang, Zhaochen Wang, Zhengbo Song et al.
Holistic Integrative Oncology
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Ethical reflections on phase I clinical trials of anticancer drugs: from a Chinese IRB’s empirical perspective

Ji Zhu, Shuting Tang, Zhaochen Wang, Zhengbo Song, Xiaoling Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose With the rapid development of Phase I clinical trials for anticancer drugs in China, addressing ethical concerns is imperative. In order to safeguard the rights, interests, and well-being of research participants, this paper aims to illustrate vital ethical issues that should not be neglected by institutional review boards as well as other relevant stakeholders for Phase I clinical trials of anticancer drugs. Methods This study retrospectively collects documents on Phase I clinical trials for anticancer drugs that were submitted to the Institutional Review Board at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from 2021 to 2023. Based on Chinese and international research regulations and guidelines, these documents, as well as initial and follow-up review resolutions, have been classified and analyzed. Results Given the additional risks of potentially toxic effects in Phase I clinical trials for anticancer drugs and the vulnerability of participants enrolled with advanced cancer status, it is important to review investigator qualifications, preliminary findings, research methods, inclusion and exclusion criteria in the protocol, as well as the validity and readability of informed consent. Additionally, attention should be given to follow-up reviews, particularly regarding safety reports and protocol deviations. Conclusion To effectively protect the rights, interests and safety of research participants. Relevant stakeholders, including sponsors, researchers, and regulatory bodies, should diligently evaluate potential risks and provision contingency plan to minimize the latent risk.

Holistic Integrative OncologyVol. 3(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Cancer Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.