Randomized, Crossover Trial of Control-IQ Technology with a Lower Treatment Range and a Modified Meal Bolus Module in Adults, Adolescents, Children, and Preschoolers with Varying Levels of Baseline Glycemic Control

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> We evaluated a modified version of Control-IQ technology with a lower treatment range and a modified meal bolus module in adults, adolescents, children, and preschoolers with type 1 diabetes in a multicenter, randomized, and crossover trial. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> After a 2-week run-in with Control-IQ technology v1.5, the modified system was evaluated for 2 weeks using treatment range of 112.5-160 mg/dL (standard range [SR]), and for 2 weeks using lower treatment range of 90-130 mg/dL (lower range, LR), at home in random order. Two late bolus meal challenges were performed in each 2-week period, bolusing 45 min after meals with and without a new late bolus feature. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 72 participants aged 3-57 years completed the study. There were no diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia events. All meal challenges were completed safely. Time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL improved the most with LR to 68.0% (+3.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +2.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. SR). Similar improvements were observed for time in tight range (TITR) 70-140 mg/dL (+3.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +4.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. SR), time >180 mg/dL, and mean glucose. Participants with lower baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) achieved the highest TIR and TITR with LR use, while the greatest improvements in TIR and TITR were evident in those with higher baseline HbA1c. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The lower treatment range and late bolus feature of the modified Control-IQ system were safe for use in all age-groups. TIR and TITR improved with LR regardless of baseline HbA1c.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0501
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pancreatic function and diabetes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized, Crossover Trial of Control-IQ Technology with a Lower Treatment Range and a Modified Meal Bolus Module in Adults, Adolescents, Children, and Preschoolers with Varying Levels of Baseline Glycemic Control

Melissa J. Schoelwer, Halis Kaan Aktürk, Viral N. Shah, Erin Cobry et al.
4 citations
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Pancreatic function and diabetes
2.29
article

Randomized, Crossover Trial of Control-IQ Technology with a Lower Treatment Range and a Modified Meal Bolus Module in Adults, Adolescents, Children, and Preschoolers with Varying Levels of Baseline Glycemic Control

Melissa J. Schoelwer, Halis Kaan Aktürk, Viral N. Shah, Erin Cobry, R. Paul Wadwa, Elvira Isganaitis, Ricardo Rueda, Victor M. Lu, Gregory P. Forlenza, Lori M. Laffel, John P. Corbett, Ravid Sasson-Katchalski, Jordan E. Pinsker, Sue A. Brown, Nicholas Sherer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> We evaluated a modified version of Control-IQ technology with a lower treatment range and a modified meal bolus module in adults, adolescents, children, and preschoolers with type 1 diabetes in a multicenter, randomized, and crossover trial. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> After a 2-week run-in with Control-IQ technology v1.5, the modified system was evaluated for 2 weeks using treatment range of 112.5-160 mg/dL (standard range [SR]), and for 2 weeks using lower treatment range of 90-130 mg/dL (lower range, LR), at home in random order. Two late bolus meal challenges were performed in each 2-week period, bolusing 45 min after meals with and without a new late bolus feature. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 72 participants aged 3-57 years completed the study. There were no diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia events. All meal challenges were completed safely. Time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL improved the most with LR to 68.0% (+3.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +2.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. SR). Similar improvements were observed for time in tight range (TITR) 70-140 mg/dL (+3.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +4.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. SR), time >180 mg/dL, and mean glucose. Participants with lower baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) achieved the highest TIR and TITR with LR use, while the greatest improvements in TIR and TITR were evident in those with higher baseline HbA1c. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The lower treatment range and late bolus feature of the modified Control-IQ system were safe for use in all age-groups. TIR and TITR improved with LR regardless of baseline HbA1c.

Diabetes Technology & TherapeuticsVol. 27(3)
Joslin Diabetes Center (US), Tandem Diabetes Care (United States) (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, University of Virginia (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Insulet Corporation, Dexcom, Tandem Diabetes Care, Novo Nordisk, National Institutes of Health, Abbott Diabetes Care
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Pancreatic function and diabetes
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.