Partisan Constituencies and Congressional Polarization

Members of the U.S. Congress have become increasingly extreme and polarized over the past 50 years, but explanations for this phenomenon remain hotly debated. This paper tests whether and to what extent Congressional polarization can be explained by the increasing partisanship of constituencies that resulted from geographic polarization and nationalized voting. I estimate that approximately 40% of the polarization in the House and 70% in the Senate can be explained by the increasing partisan alignment of constituencies. Some of this trend is explained by incentives—members cast more extreme votes when their constituency becomes more partisan, but most is explained by selection—more partisan constituencies elect more extreme representatives. Additional analyses assess the mechanisms behind this trend. Partisan alignment is mostly explained by geographic polarization, but nationalized voting has also played an important role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000104
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partisan Constituencies and Congressional Polarization

Anthony Fowler
3 citations
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
6.69
article

Partisan Constituencies and Congressional Polarization

Anthony Fowler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Members of the U.S. Congress have become increasingly extreme and polarized over the past 50 years, but explanations for this phenomenon remain hotly debated. This paper tests whether and to what extent Congressional polarization can be explained by the increasing partisanship of constituencies that resulted from geographic polarization and nationalized voting. I estimate that approximately 40% of the polarization in the House and 70% in the Senate can be explained by the increasing partisan alignment of constituencies. Some of this trend is explained by incentives—members cast more extreme votes when their constituency becomes more partisan, but most is explained by selection—more partisan constituencies elect more extreme representatives. Additional analyses assess the mechanisms behind this trend. Partisan alignment is mostly explained by geographic polarization, but nationalized voting has also played an important role.

Journal of Political Institutions and Political EconomyVol. 5(3)
University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.