A post hoc analysis of migraine‐associated symptoms from the phase 3 randomized, double‐blind, sham‐controlled Trial of External trigeminal nerve stimulation for the Acute treatment of Migraine ( <scp>TEAM)</scp> study
Our results suggest the presence of both statistically significant HTE as well as clinically meaningful HTE. Statistical differences were primarily found for photophobia MBS, while clinically meaningful HTE was primarily found for nausea MBS. These findings may be clinically relevant for patients and clinicians when developing a treatment plan for acute treatment of migraine. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological differences between MBS subtypes and treatment optimization, particularly for patients with nausea MBS subtypes.
Authors
- Gregory A. Panza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1411-3148)
- Deena E. Kuruvilla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1997-5663)
- Michael L. Johnson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9646-2223)
Institutions
- Hartford Hospital (US)
- Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
- Published
- 2024-11-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14860
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Migraine and Headache Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.39