Agents of Change or Counterarguing? Investigating the Source Credibility of Celebrity Versus Traditional Experts on Health and Political Behaviors
Two online experimental studies ( n study1 = 318, n study2 = 462) were conducted to examine whether social media informant type (celebrity influencer vs. expert) and presentation type (numeric vs. generic information) influenced behavioral intentions. Results from Study 1 found that expert-authored posts with numeric information were more persuasive for credibility assessments and, in turn, intentions to obtain the COVID-19 booster vaccine. In Study 2, we retest our hypotheses in the context of support for police reform. Contrary to expectations, neither message manipulation persuaded individuals. Partisanship, however, played a key role in behavioral intentions.
Authors
- Austin Y. Hubner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-1196)
- Judy Watts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0430-7718)
Institutions
- University of Louisville (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
- Published
- 2024-11-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241297653
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Media Influence and Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 15.63