Science for whom? The influence of the regional academic circuit on gender inequalities in Latin America

Abstract The Latin‐American scientific community has achieved significant progress towards gender parity, with nearly equal representation of women and men scientists. Nevertheless, women continue to be underrepresented in scholarly communication. Throughout the 20th century, Latin America established its academic circuit, focusing on research topics of regional significance. Through an analysis of scientific publications, this article explores the relationship between gender inequalities in science and the integration of Latin‐American researchers into the regional and global academic circuits between 1993 and 2022. We find that women are more likely to engage in the regional circuit, while men are more active within the global circuit. This trend is attributed to a thematic alignment between women's research interests and issues specific to Latin America. Furthermore, our results reveal that the mechanisms contributing to gender differences in symbolic capital accumulation vary between circuits. Women's work achieves equal or greater recognition compared to men's within the regional circuit, but generally garners less attention in the global circuit. Our findings suggest that policies aimed at strengthening the regional academic circuit would encourage scientists to address locally relevant topics while simultaneously fostering gender equality in science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24972
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Higher Education in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science for whom? The influence of the regional academic circuit on gender inequalities in Latin America

Natsumi S. Shokida, Carolina Pradier, Diego Kozlowski, Vincent Larivière
6 citations
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Higher Education in Latin America
12.58
article

Science for whom? The influence of the regional academic circuit on gender inequalities in Latin America

Natsumi S. Shokida, Carolina Pradier, Diego Kozlowski, Vincent Larivière
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Latin‐American scientific community has achieved significant progress towards gender parity, with nearly equal representation of women and men scientists. Nevertheless, women continue to be underrepresented in scholarly communication. Throughout the 20th century, Latin America established its academic circuit, focusing on research topics of regional significance. Through an analysis of scientific publications, this article explores the relationship between gender inequalities in science and the integration of Latin‐American researchers into the regional and global academic circuits between 1993 and 2022. We find that women are more likely to engage in the regional circuit, while men are more active within the global circuit. This trend is attributed to a thematic alignment between women's research interests and issues specific to Latin America. Furthermore, our results reveal that the mechanisms contributing to gender differences in symbolic capital accumulation vary between circuits. Women's work achieves equal or greater recognition compared to men's within the regional circuit, but generally garners less attention in the global circuit. Our findings suggest that policies aimed at strengthening the regional academic circuit would encourage scientists to address locally relevant topics while simultaneously fostering gender equality in science.

Journal of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 76(5)
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Université de Montréal (CA), National Research Foundation (ZA)
Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Higher Education in Latin America
12.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.