Construct Validity in Automated Counterterrorism Analysis

Abstract Governments and social scientists are increasingly developing machine learning methods to automate the process of identifying terrorists in real time and predict future attacks. However, current operationalizations of “terrorist”’ in artificial intelligence are difficult to justify given three issues that remain neglected: insufficient construct legitimacy, insufficient criterion validity, and insufficient construct validity. I conclude that machine learning methods should be at most used for the identification of singular individuals deemed terrorists and not for identifying possible terrorists from some more general class, nor to predict terrorist attacks more broadly, given intolerably high risks that result from such approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.65
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construct Validity in Automated Counterterrorism Analysis

Adrian K. Yee
3 citations
Philosophy of Science
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
5.68
article

Construct Validity in Automated Counterterrorism Analysis

Adrian K. Yee
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Governments and social scientists are increasingly developing machine learning methods to automate the process of identifying terrorists in real time and predict future attacks. However, current operationalizations of “terrorist”’ in artificial intelligence are difficult to justify given three issues that remain neglected: insufficient construct legitimacy, insufficient criterion validity, and insufficient construct validity. I conclude that machine learning methods should be at most used for the identification of singular individuals deemed terrorists and not for identifying possible terrorists from some more general class, nor to predict terrorist attacks more broadly, given intolerably high risks that result from such approaches.

Philosophy of ScienceVol. 92(3)
Lingnan University (HK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
5.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.