On Comfort(s)

Although physical comfort is a self-evidently important goal in interior design projects, whose definition is usually assumed to be obvious and straightforward (a measurable outcome of the interaction of material and anatomical variables), in practice comfort has proven itself one of the most mysterious of human spatial possibilities. Comfort has radically shifted its meanings across historical epochs and across cultures. Rather than a simple and quantifiable spatial reality, comfort should be understood as a malleable social ideology – comfort as the unstable consequence of cultural ideas about bodies, including ideas about gender, class, decorum, custom, and race, overlaid onto shifting technological, material, economic, social and ideological circumstances. Understood this way, physical comfort can be reanimated as a pliable design variable – as it has shifted previously, so it can be reshaped today. The goal of this visual essay, crafted as seven open-ended drawings framed by short introductory observations, is to pry comfort loose from simplistic understandings and invite new investigations into its mysteries and future possibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interior Design
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10717641241292618
Primary Topic
Travel Writing and Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Comfort(s)

Ronn M. Daniel, Stefan Kuljanin
Journal of Interior Design
Travel Writing and Literature
article

On Comfort(s)

Ronn M. Daniel, Stefan Kuljanin
article en

Abstract

Although physical comfort is a self-evidently important goal in interior design projects, whose definition is usually assumed to be obvious and straightforward (a measurable outcome of the interaction of material and anatomical variables), in practice comfort has proven itself one of the most mysterious of human spatial possibilities. Comfort has radically shifted its meanings across historical epochs and across cultures. Rather than a simple and quantifiable spatial reality, comfort should be understood as a malleable social ideology – comfort as the unstable consequence of cultural ideas about bodies, including ideas about gender, class, decorum, custom, and race, overlaid onto shifting technological, material, economic, social and ideological circumstances. Understood this way, physical comfort can be reanimated as a pliable design variable – as it has shifted previously, so it can be reshaped today. The goal of this visual essay, crafted as seven open-ended drawings framed by short introductory observations, is to pry comfort loose from simplistic understandings and invite new investigations into its mysteries and future possibilities.

Journal of Interior DesignVol. 49(3-4)
Kent State University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Travel Writing and Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Comfort(s) — Ronn M. Daniel, Stefan Kuljanin · Journal of Interior Design (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS