COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL-MECHANICAL AND FUNCTIONAL-TECHNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF ORGANIC AND NON-ORGANIC BEEF FOR SAUSAGE PRODUCTION

This study aims to compare the structural-mechanical and functionaltechnological properties of organic and non-organic beef, focusing on parameters such as shear stress and viscosity, to determine their suitability for sausage production. Using a Structurometer ST2, we measured the shear stress and viscosity of longissimus dorsi muscle samples from both organic and non-organic beef. Additionally, the water holding capacity (WHC) was assessed using the Grau-Hamm method, and pH changes were monitored over five days. Our results revealed that organic beef exhibited significantly higher shear stress (90.32 to 121.30 Pa) and viscosity (180.64 to 242.6 Pa·s) compared to non-organic beef (shear stress: 88.24 Pa, viscosity: 176.48 Pa·s). These differences indicate that organic beef has greater toughness, density, and better emulsion properties, contributing to enhanced texture and juiciness in sausage products. Furthermore, organic beef showed a higher WHC of 75% compared to 60% for non-organic beef, along with a stable pH range of 5.6-5.7, which is crucial for maintaining meat quality during storage and processing. The findings suggest that organic beef, due to its superior mechanical properties and moisture retention capabilities, is more suitable for producing high-quality sausage products.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Mechanics and Technologies
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55956/qdla7684
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL-MECHANICAL AND FUNCTIONAL-TECHNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF ORGANIC AND NON-ORGANIC BEEF FOR SAUSAGE PRODUCTION

Kadyrzhan Makangali, Gulnazym Ospankulova, Gulzhan Tokysheva
Mechanics and Technologies
Animal Nutrition and Health
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL-MECHANICAL AND FUNCTIONAL-TECHNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF ORGANIC AND NON-ORGANIC BEEF FOR SAUSAGE PRODUCTION

Kadyrzhan Makangali, Gulnazym Ospankulova, Gulzhan Tokysheva
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the structural-mechanical and functionaltechnological properties of organic and non-organic beef, focusing on parameters such as shear stress and viscosity, to determine their suitability for sausage production. Using a Structurometer ST2, we measured the shear stress and viscosity of longissimus dorsi muscle samples from both organic and non-organic beef. Additionally, the water holding capacity (WHC) was assessed using the Grau-Hamm method, and pH changes were monitored over five days. Our results revealed that organic beef exhibited significantly higher shear stress (90.32 to 121.30 Pa) and viscosity (180.64 to 242.6 Pa·s) compared to non-organic beef (shear stress: 88.24 Pa, viscosity: 176.48 Pa·s). These differences indicate that organic beef has greater toughness, density, and better emulsion properties, contributing to enhanced texture and juiciness in sausage products. Furthermore, organic beef showed a higher WHC of 75% compared to 60% for non-organic beef, along with a stable pH range of 5.6-5.7, which is crucial for maintaining meat quality during storage and processing. The findings suggest that organic beef, due to its superior mechanical properties and moisture retention capabilities, is more suitable for producing high-quality sausage products.

Mechanics and Technologies(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Animal Nutrition and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.