Native learning ability and not age determines the effects of brain stimulation

Healthy aging often entails a decline in cognitive and motor functions, affecting independence and quality of life in older adults. Brain stimulation shows potential to enhance these functions, but studies show variable effects. Previous studies have tried to identify responders and non-responders through correlations between behavioral change and baseline parameters, but results lack generalization to independent cohorts. We propose a method to predict an individual's likelihood of benefiting from stimulation, based on baseline performance of a sequential motor task. Our results show that individuals with less efficient learning mechanisms benefit from stimulation, while those with optimal learning strategies experience none or even detrimental effects. This differential effect, first identified in a public dataset and replicated here in an independent cohort, was linked to one's ability to integrate task-relevant information and not age. This study constitutes a further step towards personalized clinical-translational interventions based on brain stimulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00278-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Native learning ability and not age determines the effects of brain stimulation

Pablo Maceira-Elvira, Anne‐Christine Schmid, Leonardo G. Cohen, Henning Müller et al.
2 citations
npj Science of Learning
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
0.49
article

Native learning ability and not age determines the effects of brain stimulation

Pablo Maceira-Elvira, Anne‐Christine Schmid, Leonardo G. Cohen, Henning Müller, Andéol Cadic‐Melchior, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Roger Schaer, Traian Popa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Healthy aging often entails a decline in cognitive and motor functions, affecting independence and quality of life in older adults. Brain stimulation shows potential to enhance these functions, but studies show variable effects. Previous studies have tried to identify responders and non-responders through correlations between behavioral change and baseline parameters, but results lack generalization to independent cohorts. We propose a method to predict an individual's likelihood of benefiting from stimulation, based on baseline performance of a sequential motor task. Our results show that individuals with less efficient learning mechanisms benefit from stimulation, while those with optimal learning strategies experience none or even detrimental effects. This differential effect, first identified in a public dataset and replicated here in an independent cohort, was linked to one's ability to integrate task-relevant information and not age. This study constitutes a further step towards personalized clinical-translational interventions based on brain stimulation.

npj Science of LearningVol. 9(1)
University of Geneva (CH), National Institutes of Health (US), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US), HES-SO Valais-Wallis (CH), Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering (CH), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Fondation Bertarelli, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Fondation Defitech
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.