Lower obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) supply in abortion-ban states, despite minimal state-level changes in the 2 years post-<i>Dobbs</i>

Since the <i>Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> Supreme Court decision in June 2022, emerging reports suggest that the obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) workforce is moving into states without abortion bans. Using a large national administrative database, we identified OBGYNs enrolling in new states from July 2017 through June 2024. We used difference-in-differences (DID) analyses to estimate the effect of <i>Dobbs</i> on enrollments by state abortion policy (ban vs no ban). Enrollments in ban states were lower than in no-ban states in most academic years (June-July) throughout the study period. In the 2 years post-<i>Dobbs</i>, DID models found no significant differences in enrollments in ban states relative to no-ban states. These findings indicate minimal state-level shifts in the OBGYN workforce following <i>Dobbs</i>. Past research has found that a complex constellation of factors drives physician movement, including state licensure, job availability, income, spousal job opportunities, and social support. While the effect of the <i>Dobbs</i> decision on the workforce are likely to be significant, the full impacts on the workforce will take years to fully unfold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae162
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lower obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) supply in abortion-ban states, despite minimal state-level changes in the 2 years post-Dobbs

Ellen Schenk, Julia Strasser, Qian Luo, Candice Chen
10 citations
Health Affairs Scholar
Healthcare Policy and Management
11.29
article

Lower obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) supply in abortion-ban states, despite minimal state-level changes in the 2 years post-Dobbs

Ellen Schenk, Julia Strasser, Qian Luo, Candice Chen
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Since the <i>Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> Supreme Court decision in June 2022, emerging reports suggest that the obstetrician and gynecologist (OBGYN) workforce is moving into states without abortion bans. Using a large national administrative database, we identified OBGYNs enrolling in new states from July 2017 through June 2024. We used difference-in-differences (DID) analyses to estimate the effect of <i>Dobbs</i> on enrollments by state abortion policy (ban vs no ban). Enrollments in ban states were lower than in no-ban states in most academic years (June-July) throughout the study period. In the 2 years post-<i>Dobbs</i>, DID models found no significant differences in enrollments in ban states relative to no-ban states. These findings indicate minimal state-level shifts in the OBGYN workforce following <i>Dobbs</i>. Past research has found that a complex constellation of factors drives physician movement, including state licensure, job availability, income, spousal job opportunities, and social support. While the effect of the <i>Dobbs</i> decision on the workforce are likely to be significant, the full impacts on the workforce will take years to fully unfold.

Health Affairs ScholarVol. 2(12)
Milken Institute (US), George Washington University (US)
Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Healthcare Policy and Management
11.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.