Rank-based inequality measures: an alternative to Gini's index

The Gini index of economic inequality appears to be by far the most important such index. Although a variety of alternative inequality measures have been proposed, only Gini's index (G) incorporates both the income distribution and the component ranks. This paper introduces a new inequality index ( $$I_{K}$$ ) that also incorporates both the ranks and the income distribution, but with the added advantage of having the value-validity property. With the income shares considered as the weights in descending order, G becomes a decreasing linear function of the weighted mean rank whereas $$I_{K}$$ is a linearly increasing function of the weighted mean reciprocal rank. Although G and $$I_{K}$$ share several properties, the value-validity property ensures that $$I_{K}$$ takes on values throughout its range that provide true, reliable, and realistic representations of the inequality characteristic with respect to a criterion that incorporates Euclidean metric distances between income distributions. Comparison between G and $$I_{K}$$ include their numerical values based on randomly generated income distributions. Additionally, $$I_{K}$$ is determined to be closely related to the coefficient of variation as a linear (proportional) function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Economics
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-024-00481-8
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rank-based inequality measures: an alternative to Gini's index

Tarald O. Kvålseth
International Review of Economics
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Rank-based inequality measures: an alternative to Gini's index

Tarald O. Kvålseth
article en

Abstract

The Gini index of economic inequality appears to be by far the most important such index. Although a variety of alternative inequality measures have been proposed, only Gini's index (G) incorporates both the income distribution and the component ranks. This paper introduces a new inequality index ( $$I_{K}$$ ) that also incorporates both the ranks and the income distribution, but with the added advantage of having the value-validity property. With the income shares considered as the weights in descending order, G becomes a decreasing linear function of the weighted mean rank whereas $$I_{K}$$ is a linearly increasing function of the weighted mean reciprocal rank. Although G and $$I_{K}$$ share several properties, the value-validity property ensures that $$I_{K}$$ takes on values throughout its range that provide true, reliable, and realistic representations of the inequality characteristic with respect to a criterion that incorporates Euclidean metric distances between income distributions. Comparison between G and $$I_{K}$$ include their numerical values based on randomly generated income distributions. Additionally, $$I_{K}$$ is determined to be closely related to the coefficient of variation as a linear (proportional) function.

International Review of EconomicsVol. 72(1)
University of Minnesota (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rank-based inequality measures: an alternative to Gini's index — Tarald O. Kvålseth · International Review of Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS