Considering the <i>direction of innovation</i> in EU merger control

This paper considers the role that innovation plays in EU merger control analysis, and seeks to integrate perspectives highlighted by the philosophical literature on the so-called ‘direction of innovation’ in order to critically assess the impact of market concentration on the diversity of innovation and its ability to address larger normative questions and challenges, such as the transition to more sustainable economies. While normative goals other than competition are not an inherent part of merger control, this paper argues that in concentrated markets, ignoring such questions can play into the hands of the powerful merging entities, allowing them to further determine the direction of innovation to best serve their interests and business models rather than public interests. This is illustrated by critically discussing the merger between Bayer and Monsanto as an example.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2425120
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering the direction of innovation in EU merger control

Juliane K. Mendelsohn, Lukas Breide
2 citations
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Corporate Governance and Law
1.11
article

Considering the direction of innovation in EU merger control

Juliane K. Mendelsohn, Lukas Breide
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper considers the role that innovation plays in EU merger control analysis, and seeks to integrate perspectives highlighted by the philosophical literature on the so-called ‘direction of innovation’ in order to critically assess the impact of market concentration on the diversity of innovation and its ability to address larger normative questions and challenges, such as the transition to more sustainable economies. While normative goals other than competition are not an inherent part of merger control, this paper argues that in concentrated markets, ignoring such questions can play into the hands of the powerful merging entities, allowing them to further determine the direction of innovation to best serve their interests and business models rather than public interests. This is illustrated by critically discussing the merger between Bayer and Monsanto as an example.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 11(1)
Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Corporate Governance and Law
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Considering the <i>direction of innovation</i> in EU merger control — Juliane K. Mendelsohn, Lukas Breide · Journal of Responsible Innovation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS