Regeneration of Spent Desiccants with Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>

Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> (sCO<sub>2</sub>) dehydrates desiccants such as silica gel, activated carbon, graphite, and molecular sieve by dissolving and emulsifying the water. Despite differences in the surface area of these desiccants, the amount of water removed under comparable conditions is the same. The main advantage of sCO<sub>2</sub> dewatering over conventional hot-air regeneration lies in situations where the exhaust contains environmentally sensitive components, e.g., in nuclear detritiation operations where the small footprint and closed cycle benefits of the sCO<sub>2</sub> process are especially significant. Calculations show that depressurizing the spent sCO<sub>2</sub> to half its initial pressure drops out most of the water, after which the CO<sub>2</sub> can be repressurized and reused. sCO<sub>2</sub> dewatering requires about half the energy needed for thermal drying because the water is removed nonevaporatively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c03636
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regeneration of Spent Desiccants with Supercritical CO2

Sujit Banerjee, Bhima Sastri, Andrés Márquez, Brian K. Via et al.
3 citations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
0.55
article

Regeneration of Spent Desiccants with Supercritical CO2

Sujit Banerjee, Bhima Sastri, Andrés Márquez, Brian K. Via, Iris Beatriz Vega Erramuspe
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> (sCO<sub>2</sub>) dehydrates desiccants such as silica gel, activated carbon, graphite, and molecular sieve by dissolving and emulsifying the water. Despite differences in the surface area of these desiccants, the amount of water removed under comparable conditions is the same. The main advantage of sCO<sub>2</sub> dewatering over conventional hot-air regeneration lies in situations where the exhaust contains environmentally sensitive components, e.g., in nuclear detritiation operations where the small footprint and closed cycle benefits of the sCO<sub>2</sub> process are especially significant. Calculations show that depressurizing the spent sCO<sub>2</sub> to half its initial pressure drops out most of the water, after which the CO<sub>2</sub> can be repressurized and reused. sCO<sub>2</sub> dewatering requires about half the energy needed for thermal drying because the water is removed nonevaporatively.

Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchVol. 63(49)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Auburn University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.