Current state of studies of the reception of Kant in Russian religious philosophy and its problems

There are a number of difficulties and problems in contemporary studies of the perception of Kants philosophy in Russian religious philosophy. They pose serious problems for a comprehensive and thorough investigation of this theme. Firstly, it is the translation of outdated patterns. These patterns were formed at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in first works of Russian Kantianism, written under the conditions of insufficient acquaintance with primary sources and refuted by the latest studies. However the results of these studies are ignored in significant layers of modern research literature. Second, it is an attempt to reduce Russian philosophy to Russian religious philosophy, and the latter mainly to the Soloviev and post-Soloviev period. Such a reduction excludes a huge number of personalities and works of Russian thinkers of the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Thirdly, it is the presence of significant gaps in the knowledge of Kants reception in Russian religious philosophy, which still remain white spots. These lacunas and white spots prevent the creation of an adequate overall picture. They include the spread of Kantian philosophy in seminaries, the specific characteristic of reception of Kantian philosophy in the St. Petersburg, Moscow, Kiev, and Kazan Theological Academies, the reflection of Kantian philosophy on pages of printed editions of the Theological Academies, and the constancy or variation of evaluations of Kantian philosophy in emigration. Fourth, it is the ignorance of the reception of Kantian philosophy in Western European Protestantism, Catholicism, and Orthodoxy outside Russia. Such ignorance leads to a distorted assessment as uniquely Russian and Orthodox features of such philosophical aspects, which at different times have repeatedly taken place outside Russia as well. The goal of future research is to demonstrate the diversity of positions regarding Kantian philosophy in Russian religious philosophy, from categorical rejection to strong acceptance, taking into account the European Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
St Tikhon s University Review
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2024115.34-47
Primary Topic
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current state of studies of the reception of Kant in Russian religious philosophy and its problems

Alexei Krouglov
St Tikhon s University Review
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
article

Current state of studies of the reception of Kant in Russian religious philosophy and its problems

Alexei Krouglov
article en

Abstract

There are a number of difficulties and problems in contemporary studies of the perception of Kants philosophy in Russian religious philosophy. They pose serious problems for a comprehensive and thorough investigation of this theme. Firstly, it is the translation of outdated patterns. These patterns were formed at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in first works of Russian Kantianism, written under the conditions of insufficient acquaintance with primary sources and refuted by the latest studies. However the results of these studies are ignored in significant layers of modern research literature. Second, it is an attempt to reduce Russian philosophy to Russian religious philosophy, and the latter mainly to the Soloviev and post-Soloviev period. Such a reduction excludes a huge number of personalities and works of Russian thinkers of the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Thirdly, it is the presence of significant gaps in the knowledge of Kants reception in Russian religious philosophy, which still remain white spots. These lacunas and white spots prevent the creation of an adequate overall picture. They include the spread of Kantian philosophy in seminaries, the specific characteristic of reception of Kantian philosophy in the St. Petersburg, Moscow, Kiev, and Kazan Theological Academies, the reflection of Kantian philosophy on pages of printed editions of the Theological Academies, and the constancy or variation of evaluations of Kantian philosophy in emigration. Fourth, it is the ignorance of the reception of Kantian philosophy in Western European Protestantism, Catholicism, and Orthodoxy outside Russia. Such ignorance leads to a distorted assessment as uniquely Russian and Orthodox features of such philosophical aspects, which at different times have repeatedly taken place outside Russia as well. The goal of future research is to demonstrate the diversity of positions regarding Kantian philosophy in Russian religious philosophy, from categorical rejection to strong acceptance, taking into account the European Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox contexts.

St Tikhon s University ReviewVol. 115
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.