Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions
We study regressions with multiple treatments and a set of controls that is flexible enough to purge omitted variable bias. We show these regressions generally fail to estimate convex averages of heterogeneous treatment effects—instead, estimates of each treatment’s effect are contaminated by nonconvex averages of the effects of other treatments. We discuss three estimation approaches that avoid such contamination bias, including the targeting of easiest-to-estimate weighted average effects. A reanalysis of nine empirical applications finds economically and statistically meaningful contamination bias in observational studies; contamination bias in experimental studies is more limited due to smaller variability in propensity scores. (JEL C21, C31, C51, H75, I21, I28)
Authors
- Peter Hull
- Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4959-8192)
- Michal Kolesár (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2482-7796)
Institutions
- John Brown University (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Yale University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Economic Review
- Published
- 2024-11-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20221116
- Citations
- 33
- Primary Topic
- Statistical Methods and Inference
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 22.69