Bias and Sensitivity under Ambiguity

This paper characterizes the effects of ambiguity aversion under dispersed information. The equilibrium outcome is observationally equivalent to a Bayesian forecast of the fundamental with increased sensitivity to signals and a pessimistic bias. This equivalence result takes a simple form that accommodates dynamic information and strategic interactions. Applying the result, we show that ambiguity aversion helps rationalize the joint empirical pattern between the bias and persistence of inflation forecasts conditional on household income. In a policy game à la Barro and Gordon (1983) with ambiguity-averse agents, the policy rule features higher average inflation and increased responsiveness to fundamentals. (JEL D81, D83, E31, E37, E71)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20231012
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias and Sensitivity under Ambiguity

Marcelo Pedroni, Zhen Huo, Guangyu Pei
4 citations
American Economic Review
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
2.14
article

Bias and Sensitivity under Ambiguity

Marcelo Pedroni, Zhen Huo, Guangyu Pei
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper characterizes the effects of ambiguity aversion under dispersed information. The equilibrium outcome is observationally equivalent to a Bayesian forecast of the fundamental with increased sensitivity to signals and a pessimistic bias. This equivalence result takes a simple form that accommodates dynamic information and strategic interactions. Applying the result, we show that ambiguity aversion helps rationalize the joint empirical pattern between the bias and persistence of inflation forecasts conditional on household income. In a policy game à la Barro and Gordon (1983) with ambiguity-averse agents, the policy rule features higher average inflation and increased responsiveness to fundamentals. (JEL D81, D83, E31, E37, E71)

American Economic ReviewVol. 114(12)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Tinbergen Institute (NL), Yale University (US), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bias and Sensitivity under Ambiguity — Marcelo Pedroni, Zhen Huo, et al. · American Economic Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS