The Legal Foundations of Property 1924–1978

This work traces the evolving interpretation of property as revealed in key U.S. Supreme Court rulings between 1924 and 1978. The degree of influence of any given case is determined by ranking case citations from the time of ruling to the time of writing. A series of queries was applied to the open-source AI, ChatGPT, as a corroborating source. I find that over this period there exist multiple lines of evolving thought regarding the nature of property and the public purpose. First, economic methods and techniques associated with market valuation are increasingly employed as a method to determine what constitutes property as well as the public interest. Second, despite increasing formal economic input, the court consistently finds “space” within the known economic data in which to exercise their discretion over the meanings of property and the public purpose. Third, there exists a “back and forth” between points one and two; namely, that what is decided based upon court discretion, later becomes a matter of economic fact, which in turn leads to new areas of court discretion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Issues
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2024.2418262
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Legal Foundations of Property 1924–1978

Thomas Kemp
Journal of Economic Issues
Land Rights and Reforms
article

The Legal Foundations of Property 1924–1978

Thomas Kemp
article en

Abstract

This work traces the evolving interpretation of property as revealed in key U.S. Supreme Court rulings between 1924 and 1978. The degree of influence of any given case is determined by ranking case citations from the time of ruling to the time of writing. A series of queries was applied to the open-source AI, ChatGPT, as a corroborating source. I find that over this period there exist multiple lines of evolving thought regarding the nature of property and the public purpose. First, economic methods and techniques associated with market valuation are increasingly employed as a method to determine what constitutes property as well as the public interest. Second, despite increasing formal economic input, the court consistently finds “space” within the known economic data in which to exercise their discretion over the meanings of property and the public purpose. Third, there exists a “back and forth” between points one and two; namely, that what is decided based upon court discretion, later becomes a matter of economic fact, which in turn leads to new areas of court discretion.

Journal of Economic IssuesVol. 58(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Legal Foundations of Property 1924–1978 — Thomas Kemp · Journal of Economic Issues (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS