Portfolio Optimization Based on Almost Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance

In portfolio optimization, the computational complexity of implementing almost stochastic dominance has limited its practical applications. In this study, we introduce an optimization framework aimed at identifying the optimal portfolio that outperforms a specified benchmark under almost second-degree stochastic dominance (ASSD). Our approach involves discretizing the return range and establishing both sufficient and necessary conditions for ASSD. We then propose a three-step iterative procedure: first, identifying a candidate portfolio; second, assessing its optimality; and third, refining the discretization scheme. Theoretical analysis guarantees that the portfolio identified through this iterative process improves with each iteration, ultimately converging to the optimal solution. Our empirical study, utilizing industry portfolios, demonstrates the efficacy of our approach by consistently identifying an optimal portfolio within a few iterations. Furthermore, comparative analysis against other decision criteria, such as mean-variance, second-degree stochastic dominance, and third-degree stochastic dominance, reveals that ASSD generally leads to portfolios with higher out-of-sample average excess returns but also entails increased variations and risks. This paper was accepted by Agostino Capponi, finance. Funding: C. Luo acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72101070] and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant LY23G010001]. P. Chen acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72401253]. P. Jaillet acknowledges financial support from the Office of Naval Research [Grant N00014-18-1-2122 and N00014-24-1-2470] and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research [Grant FA9550-23-1-0182 and Grant FA9550-23-1-0190]. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01092 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01092
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portfolio Optimization Based on Almost Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance

Chunling Luo, Piao Chen, Patrick Jaillet
17 citations
Management Science
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
8.34
article

Portfolio Optimization Based on Almost Second-Degree Stochastic Dominance

Chunling Luo, Piao Chen, Patrick Jaillet
article en
17 citations

Abstract

In portfolio optimization, the computational complexity of implementing almost stochastic dominance has limited its practical applications. In this study, we introduce an optimization framework aimed at identifying the optimal portfolio that outperforms a specified benchmark under almost second-degree stochastic dominance (ASSD). Our approach involves discretizing the return range and establishing both sufficient and necessary conditions for ASSD. We then propose a three-step iterative procedure: first, identifying a candidate portfolio; second, assessing its optimality; and third, refining the discretization scheme. Theoretical analysis guarantees that the portfolio identified through this iterative process improves with each iteration, ultimately converging to the optimal solution. Our empirical study, utilizing industry portfolios, demonstrates the efficacy of our approach by consistently identifying an optimal portfolio within a few iterations. Furthermore, comparative analysis against other decision criteria, such as mean-variance, second-degree stochastic dominance, and third-degree stochastic dominance, reveals that ASSD generally leads to portfolios with higher out-of-sample average excess returns but also entails increased variations and risks. This paper was accepted by Agostino Capponi, finance. Funding: C. Luo acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72101070] and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant LY23G010001]. P. Chen acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72401253]. P. Jaillet acknowledges financial support from the Office of Naval Research [Grant N00014-18-1-2122 and N00014-24-1-2470] and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research [Grant FA9550-23-1-0182 and Grant FA9550-23-1-0190]. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01092 .

Management ScienceVol. 71(8)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Decision Systems (United States) (US), Zhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute (CN), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
8.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.