Ecological Systems Classification: Integrating Machine Learning, Ancillary Modeling, and Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery

Spatial land cover depictions are essential for ecological and environmental management. The thematic resolution of land cover and vegetation maps is also a significant factor affecting the ability to effectively develop policy and land management decisions based on spatial data. Natural resource and conservation planners often seek to develop strategies at broad scales; however, high-quality spatial data depicting current vegetation and ecosystem types over large areas are often unavailable. Since widely available land cover and vegetation datasets are generally lacking in either thematic resolution or spatial coverage, there is a need to integrate modeling approaches and ancillary data with traditional satellite image classifications to produce more detailed ecosystem maps for large areas. In this study, we present a comprehensive approach using satellite imagery, machine learning, and ancillary modeling approaches to develop high-resolution ecological system type maps statewide for Arkansas, USA. A RandomForest land cover classification of Sentinel-2 imagery was generated and further articulated into ecological types using a comprehensive set of secondary modeling approaches. A total of 123 types were mapped in Arkansas, including common cultural and ruderal land cover and vegetation such as pine plantations and developed types. Ozark–Ouachita Dry–Mesic Forest covered the most area, 17.51% of the state. Row Crops covered 17.16%. Twenty-five pine or pine plantation types covered 19.73% of the state, with Ozark–Ouachita pine woodland or mature pine plantation covering 6.15%. Field survey points were used to assess the quality of the mapped ecological systems. The approaches presented here provide a framework for finer resolution mapping of ecological systems at broad scales in other regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234440
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological Systems Classification: Integrating Machine Learning, Ancillary Modeling, and Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery

Michael Sunde, Lee F. Elliott, David D. Diamond
2 citations
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
0.92
article

Ecological Systems Classification: Integrating Machine Learning, Ancillary Modeling, and Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery

Michael Sunde, Lee F. Elliott, David D. Diamond
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Spatial land cover depictions are essential for ecological and environmental management. The thematic resolution of land cover and vegetation maps is also a significant factor affecting the ability to effectively develop policy and land management decisions based on spatial data. Natural resource and conservation planners often seek to develop strategies at broad scales; however, high-quality spatial data depicting current vegetation and ecosystem types over large areas are often unavailable. Since widely available land cover and vegetation datasets are generally lacking in either thematic resolution or spatial coverage, there is a need to integrate modeling approaches and ancillary data with traditional satellite image classifications to produce more detailed ecosystem maps for large areas. In this study, we present a comprehensive approach using satellite imagery, machine learning, and ancillary modeling approaches to develop high-resolution ecological system type maps statewide for Arkansas, USA. A RandomForest land cover classification of Sentinel-2 imagery was generated and further articulated into ecological types using a comprehensive set of secondary modeling approaches. A total of 123 types were mapped in Arkansas, including common cultural and ruderal land cover and vegetation such as pine plantations and developed types. Ozark–Ouachita Dry–Mesic Forest covered the most area, 17.51% of the state. Row Crops covered 17.16%. Twenty-five pine or pine plantation types covered 19.73% of the state, with Ozark–Ouachita pine woodland or mature pine plantation covering 6.15%. Field survey points were used to assess the quality of the mapped ecological systems. The approaches presented here provide a framework for finer resolution mapping of ecological systems at broad scales in other regions.

Remote SensingVol. 16(23)
University of Missouri (US)
Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.