Devising optimized maize nitrogen stress indices in complex field conditions from UAV hyperspectral imagery

Abstract Nitrogen Sufficiency Index (NSI) is an important nitrogen (N) stress indicator for precision N management. It is usually calculated using variables such as leaf chlorophyll meter readings (SPAD) and vegetation indices (VIs). However, no consensus has been reached on the most preferred variable. Additionally, conventional NSI (NSI uni ) calculation assumes N being the sole yield-limiting factor, neglecting other factors such as soil water variability. To tackle these issues, this study compared various variables for NSI calculation and evaluated two new N stress indicators in minimizing the impact of confounding water treatment. The following ground- and aerial-derived variables were compared for NSI uni calculation: SPAD, sampled leaf and canopy N content (LNC, CNC), LNC and CNC estimated using hyperspectral images acquired by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, and three VIs (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalized Red Edge Index (NDRE), and Chlorophyll Index) from the hyperspectral images. Results demonstrated that ground-measured variables outperformed aerial-based variables in deriving N-responsive NSI. Especially, LNC derived NSI uni responded to N treatment significantly in ten out of thirteen site-date datasets. For the second objective, a modified NSI (NSI w ) and the NDRE/NDVI ratio were compared to NSI uni . NSI w reduced water treatment effects in over 80% of the datasets where NSI uni showed evident impacts. NDRE/NDVI performed similarly to NSI w , with the notable advantage of not requiring prior knowledge of soil water spatial distribution. This research pioneers the optimization of N stress indicators by identifying the best variables for NSI and mitigating the effects of soil water variability. These advancements significantly contribute to precision N management in complex field conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Precision Agriculture
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10205-1
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Devising optimized maize nitrogen stress indices in complex field conditions from UAV hyperspectral imagery

Jiating Li, Timothy J. Arkebauer, Geng Bai, Guillermo R. Balboa et al.
5 citations
Precision Agriculture
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
2.29
article

Devising optimized maize nitrogen stress indices in complex field conditions from UAV hyperspectral imagery

Jiating Li, Timothy J. Arkebauer, Geng Bai, Guillermo R. Balboa, John A. Gamon, Derek M. Heeren, Yeyin Shi, Laila A. Puntel, Yufeng Ge
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen Sufficiency Index (NSI) is an important nitrogen (N) stress indicator for precision N management. It is usually calculated using variables such as leaf chlorophyll meter readings (SPAD) and vegetation indices (VIs). However, no consensus has been reached on the most preferred variable. Additionally, conventional NSI (NSI uni ) calculation assumes N being the sole yield-limiting factor, neglecting other factors such as soil water variability. To tackle these issues, this study compared various variables for NSI calculation and evaluated two new N stress indicators in minimizing the impact of confounding water treatment. The following ground- and aerial-derived variables were compared for NSI uni calculation: SPAD, sampled leaf and canopy N content (LNC, CNC), LNC and CNC estimated using hyperspectral images acquired by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, and three VIs (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalized Red Edge Index (NDRE), and Chlorophyll Index) from the hyperspectral images. Results demonstrated that ground-measured variables outperformed aerial-based variables in deriving N-responsive NSI. Especially, LNC derived NSI uni responded to N treatment significantly in ten out of thirteen site-date datasets. For the second objective, a modified NSI (NSI w ) and the NDRE/NDVI ratio were compared to NSI uni . NSI w reduced water treatment effects in over 80% of the datasets where NSI uni showed evident impacts. NDRE/NDVI performed similarly to NSI w , with the notable advantage of not requiring prior knowledge of soil water spatial distribution. This research pioneers the optimization of N stress indicators by identifying the best variables for NSI and mitigating the effects of soil water variability. These advancements significantly contribute to precision N management in complex field conditions.

Precision AgricultureVol. 26(1)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.