‘You seem a very intelligent man, and can speak English’: Gaels and Government Inquiries in the Later Nineteenth Century

The Napier Commission (1883), with its focus on the condition of the crofting communities in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, enjoys a particularly prominent status within the historiography due in large part to the voluminous evidence it collected from a cross-spectrum of Highland society. This article considers the ways in which Gaelic speakers were accommodated by this commission and by the later Deer Forest Commission (1893−4), while the language in which many of the witnesses delivered their testimony was simultaneously invisibilised by the official, published evidence. The approaches of governmental evidence-gathering from earlier in the century are considered before focusing on these two commissions which afforded Gaelic speakers the opportunity, on an unprecedented scale, to address these inquiries in their native language. The hazy figure of the interpreter is considered, supplemented by evidence from the contemporary press, as are the ways in which this interpreting process was handled and some of the challenges it presented for witnesses and commissioners. This raises questions relating to the wider linguistic landscape of the nineteenth-century Highlands, to the power dynamic between Gaelic and English speakers and to the ways in which this language barrier was negotiated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical review
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/shr.2024.0699
Primary Topic
Scottish History and National Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘You seem a very intelligent man, and can speak English’: Gaels and Government Inquiries in the Later Nineteenth Century

Sheila M. Kidd
Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical review
Scottish History and National Identity
article

‘You seem a very intelligent man, and can speak English’: Gaels and Government Inquiries in the Later Nineteenth Century

Sheila M. Kidd
article en

Abstract

The Napier Commission (1883), with its focus on the condition of the crofting communities in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, enjoys a particularly prominent status within the historiography due in large part to the voluminous evidence it collected from a cross-spectrum of Highland society. This article considers the ways in which Gaelic speakers were accommodated by this commission and by the later Deer Forest Commission (1893−4), while the language in which many of the witnesses delivered their testimony was simultaneously invisibilised by the official, published evidence. The approaches of governmental evidence-gathering from earlier in the century are considered before focusing on these two commissions which afforded Gaelic speakers the opportunity, on an unprecedented scale, to address these inquiries in their native language. The hazy figure of the interpreter is considered, supplemented by evidence from the contemporary press, as are the ways in which this interpreting process was handled and some of the challenges it presented for witnesses and commissioners. This raises questions relating to the wider linguistic landscape of the nineteenth-century Highlands, to the power dynamic between Gaelic and English speakers and to the ways in which this language barrier was negotiated.

Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical reviewVol. 104(1)
Girls Incorporated (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Scottish History and National Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.