Numerical Modeling of Direct Current Plasma Versus Natural Gas‐Heated Steelmaking Ladles: Validation via Full‐Scale Industrial Measurements

Conventional preheating methods for large steelmaking ladles typically use natural gas or liquified petroleum gas burners, which often have low thermal efficiencies depending on the fuel and oxidizer used. Common issues with these burners include lower overall bottom ladle temperatures and initiating decarburization in newly lined ladles with carbon‐rich refractory materials caused by the entrainment of air and combusting by‐products. In response to these issues, this study investigates the feasibility of using DC plasma torches for ladle preheating with nitrogen as carrier gas. Numerical models are developed to simulate ladles preheated by plasma torches, considering two variations: a 0.7 and a 1.5 MW torch. Additionally, a comparative model for a natural gas‐heated ladle is developed. The numerical results show that ladles heated by plasma torches achieve higher overall bottom temperatures due to strong convective heat flux, with average bottom temperatures of 983 and 1402 °C for 0.7 and 1.5 MW torch respectively, compared to 874 °C for natural gas heated ladle. The developed models are validated with industrial measurements on full‐sized ladles, confirming the feasibility of using plasma torches for preheating steelmaking ladles to temperatures similar to or higher than those achieved by conventional gas burners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
steel research international
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.202400510
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Modeling of Direct Current Plasma Versus Natural Gas‐Heated Steelmaking Ladles: Validation via Full‐Scale Industrial Measurements

Herbert Köchner, Daniel Sundberg, M. Holmström, N. Pérez et al.
1 citations
steel research international
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
0.21
article

Numerical Modeling of Direct Current Plasma Versus Natural Gas‐Heated Steelmaking Ladles: Validation via Full‐Scale Industrial Measurements

Herbert Köchner, Daniel Sundberg, M. Holmström, N. Pérez, Björn Glaser, Asier Arteaga Ayarza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Conventional preheating methods for large steelmaking ladles typically use natural gas or liquified petroleum gas burners, which often have low thermal efficiencies depending on the fuel and oxidizer used. Common issues with these burners include lower overall bottom ladle temperatures and initiating decarburization in newly lined ladles with carbon‐rich refractory materials caused by the entrainment of air and combusting by‐products. In response to these issues, this study investigates the feasibility of using DC plasma torches for ladle preheating with nitrogen as carrier gas. Numerical models are developed to simulate ladles preheated by plasma torches, considering two variations: a 0.7 and a 1.5 MW torch. Additionally, a comparative model for a natural gas‐heated ladle is developed. The numerical results show that ladles heated by plasma torches achieve higher overall bottom temperatures due to strong convective heat flux, with average bottom temperatures of 983 and 1402 °C for 0.7 and 1.5 MW torch respectively, compared to 874 °C for natural gas heated ladle. The developed models are validated with industrial measurements on full‐sized ladles, confirming the feasibility of using plasma torches for preheating steelmaking ladles to temperatures similar to or higher than those achieved by conventional gas burners.

steel research internationalVol. 96(8)
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo (ES), ScanArc Plasma Technologies (Sweden) (SE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
European Commission, Research Fund for Coal and Steel
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.