Contrasting flow dynamics between stationary and moving clapping bodies

Flow dynamics of pulse-jetting aquatic animals are often studied with apparatus kept stationary. This paper examines whether the stationary configuration captures the mechanics of the swimming animal. A clapping body, simulating a pulse-jet animal, is tested in freely propelled (dynamic) and forward motion constrained (stationary) conditions. Significant differences are observed in body motion and wake structure: clapping motion is nearly twice as fast in dynamic cases, while mean thrust coefficient and vortex circulation are higher in stationary cases, varying with body depth but which remain constant in dynamic cases. Care is needed in extrapolating data from stationary to swimming bodies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Fluids
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevfluids.9.114702
Primary Topic
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting flow dynamics between stationary and moving clapping bodies

Jaywant H. Arakeri, Suyog V. Mahulkar
Physical Review Fluids
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
article

Contrasting flow dynamics between stationary and moving clapping bodies

Jaywant H. Arakeri, Suyog V. Mahulkar
article en

Abstract

Flow dynamics of pulse-jetting aquatic animals are often studied with apparatus kept stationary. This paper examines whether the stationary configuration captures the mechanics of the swimming animal. A clapping body, simulating a pulse-jet animal, is tested in freely propelled (dynamic) and forward motion constrained (stationary) conditions. Significant differences are observed in body motion and wake structure: clapping motion is nearly twice as fast in dynamic cases, while mean thrust coefficient and vortex circulation are higher in stationary cases, varying with body depth but which remain constant in dynamic cases. Care is needed in extrapolating data from stationary to swimming bodies.

Physical Review FluidsVol. 9(11)
Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN), Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India, Naval Research Board
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contrasting flow dynamics between stationary and moving clapping bodies — Jaywant H. Arakeri, Suyog V. Mahulkar · Physical Review Fluids (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS