Optimizing post-Newtonian parameters and fixing the BMS frame for numerical-relativity waveform hybridizations

Numerical relativity (NR) simulations of binary black holes provide precise waveforms, but are typically too computationally expensive to produce waveforms with enough orbits to cover the whole frequency band of gravitational-wave observatories. Accordingly, it is important to be able to hybridize NR waveforms with analytic, post-Newtonian (PN) waveforms, which are accurate during the early inspiral phase. We show that to build such hybrids, it is crucial to both fix the Bondi-Metzner-Sachs (BMS) frame of the NR waveforms to match that of PN theory, and optimize over the PN parameters to mitigate the error caused by the discrepancy between NR and PN parameters. We test such a hybridization procedure including all spin-weighted spherical harmonic modes with $|m|\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\ell}$ for $\ensuremath{\ell}\ensuremath{\le}8$, using 29 NR waveforms with mass ratios $q\ensuremath{\le}10$ and spin magnitudes $|{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{1}|,|{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{2}|\ensuremath{\le}0.8$. We find that for spin-aligned systems, the PN and NR waveforms agree very well. The difference is limited by the small nonzero orbital eccentricity of the NR waveforms, or equivalently by the lack of eccentric terms in the PN waveforms. To maintain full accuracy of the simulations, the matching window for spin-aligned systems should be at least 5 orbits long and end at least 15 orbits before merger. For precessing systems, the errors are larger than for spin-aligned cases. The errors are likely limited by the absence of precession-related spin-spin PN terms. Using ${10}^{5}M$ long NR waveforms, we find that there is no optimal choice of the matching window within this time span, because the hybridization result for precessing cases is always better if using earlier or longer matching windows. We provide the mean orbital frequency of the smallest acceptable matching window as a function of the target error between the PN and NR waveforms and the black hole spins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.104076
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing post-Newtonian parameters and fixing the BMS frame for numerical-relativity waveform hybridizations

Michael Boyle, Keefe Mitman, Leo C. Stein, Dongze Sun et al.
5 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.66
article

Optimizing post-Newtonian parameters and fixing the BMS frame for numerical-relativity waveform hybridizations

Michael Boyle, Keefe Mitman, Leo C. Stein, Dongze Sun, Mark Scheel, Saul A. Teukolsky, Vijay Varma
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Numerical relativity (NR) simulations of binary black holes provide precise waveforms, but are typically too computationally expensive to produce waveforms with enough orbits to cover the whole frequency band of gravitational-wave observatories. Accordingly, it is important to be able to hybridize NR waveforms with analytic, post-Newtonian (PN) waveforms, which are accurate during the early inspiral phase. We show that to build such hybrids, it is crucial to both fix the Bondi-Metzner-Sachs (BMS) frame of the NR waveforms to match that of PN theory, and optimize over the PN parameters to mitigate the error caused by the discrepancy between NR and PN parameters. We test such a hybridization procedure including all spin-weighted spherical harmonic modes with $|m|\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\ell}$ for $\ensuremath{\ell}\ensuremath{\le}8$, using 29 NR waveforms with mass ratios $q\ensuremath{\le}10$ and spin magnitudes $|{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{1}|,|{\ensuremath{\chi}}_{2}|\ensuremath{\le}0.8$. We find that for spin-aligned systems, the PN and NR waveforms agree very well. The difference is limited by the small nonzero orbital eccentricity of the NR waveforms, or equivalently by the lack of eccentric terms in the PN waveforms. To maintain full accuracy of the simulations, the matching window for spin-aligned systems should be at least 5 orbits long and end at least 15 orbits before merger. For precessing systems, the errors are larger than for spin-aligned cases. The errors are likely limited by the absence of precession-related spin-spin PN terms. Using ${10}^{5}M$ long NR waveforms, we find that there is no optimal choice of the matching window within this time span, because the hybridization result for precessing cases is always better if using earlier or longer matching windows. We provide the mean orbital frequency of the smallest acceptable matching window as a function of the target error between the PN and NR waveforms and the black hole spins.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(10)
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US), California Institute of Technology (US), Cornell University (US), University of Mississippi (US), Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (DE)
National Science Foundation, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Office of Naval Research, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.