Mapping Burned Area in the Caatinga Biome: Employing Deep Learning Techniques

The semi-arid Caatinga biome is particularly susceptible to fire dynamics. Periodic droughts amplify fire risks, while anthropogenic activities such as agriculture, pasture expansion, and land-clearing significantly contribute to the prevalence of fires. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a fire detection model and analyze the spatial and temporal patterns of burned areas, providing essential insights for fire management and prevention strategies. Utilizing deep neural network (DNN) models, we mapped burned areas across the Caatinga biome from 1985 to 2023, based on Landsat-derived annual quality mosaics and minimum NBR values. Over the 38-year period, the model classified 10.9 Mha (12.7% of the Caatinga) as burned, with an average annual burned area of approximately 0.5 Mha (0.56%). The peak burned area reached 0.89 Mha in 2021. Fire scars varied significantly, ranging from 0.18 Mha in 1985 to substantial fluctuations in subsequent years. The most affected vegetation type was savanna, with 9.8 Mha burned, while forests experienced only 0.28 Mha of burning. October emerged as the month with the highest fire activity, accounting for 7266 hectares. These findings underscore the complex interplay of climatic and anthropogenic factors, highlighting the urgent need for effective fire management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7120437
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Burned Area in the Caatinga Biome: Employing Deep Learning Techniques

Rodrigo Nogueira de Vasconcelos, Washington Franca-Rocha, Jefferson Ferreira‐Ferreira, Diego Pereira Costa et al.
8 citations
Fire
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.26
article

Mapping Burned Area in the Caatinga Biome: Employing Deep Learning Techniques

Rodrigo Nogueira de Vasconcelos, Washington Franca-Rocha, Jefferson Ferreira‐Ferreira, Diego Pereira Costa, Nerivaldo Afonso Santos, Wallace Vieira da Silva, Mariana Martins Medeiros de Santana, Ane Alencar, Soltan Galano Duverger, Mariana Oliveira, Leonardo da Silva Barbosa, Carlos Leandro Cordeiro, Vera L. S. Arruda, Rafael O. Franca Rocha
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The semi-arid Caatinga biome is particularly susceptible to fire dynamics. Periodic droughts amplify fire risks, while anthropogenic activities such as agriculture, pasture expansion, and land-clearing significantly contribute to the prevalence of fires. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a fire detection model and analyze the spatial and temporal patterns of burned areas, providing essential insights for fire management and prevention strategies. Utilizing deep neural network (DNN) models, we mapped burned areas across the Caatinga biome from 1985 to 2023, based on Landsat-derived annual quality mosaics and minimum NBR values. Over the 38-year period, the model classified 10.9 Mha (12.7% of the Caatinga) as burned, with an average annual burned area of approximately 0.5 Mha (0.56%). The peak burned area reached 0.89 Mha in 2021. Fire scars varied significantly, ranging from 0.18 Mha in 1985 to substantial fluctuations in subsequent years. The most affected vegetation type was savanna, with 9.8 Mha burned, while forests experienced only 0.28 Mha of burning. October emerged as the month with the highest fire activity, accounting for 7266 hectares. These findings underscore the complex interplay of climatic and anthropogenic factors, highlighting the urgent need for effective fire management strategies.

FireVol. 7(12)
Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), World Resources Institute (US), Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (BR), Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR), Universidade Estadual do Amapá (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.