Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management—summary of updated NICE guidance

### What you need to know Bacterial meningitis and meningococcal disease are uncommon but life-threatening conditions. Early recognition is important but difficult because of the non-specific ways in which individuals present. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) initially published guidance on the conditions in 2010 and, after a surveillance review in 2018, updated it following changes in guideline development methodology and to reflect recent developments in vaccination.1 The 2024 guidance also extends the population of the original guideline from children only to including recommendations for adults.1 The term “bacterial meningitis” includes meningococcal meningitis without meningococcal sepsis and meningitis caused by other bacteria, while the term “meningococcal disease” includes meningococcal sepsis with or without meningococcal meningitis. Evidence for the two conditions was reviewed separately but considered in parallel. Whether separate recommendations were needed for each condition was decided based on the evidence and Guideline Committee’s experience. In this article, we summarise selected recommendations related to early recognition of these conditions, timing of investigations, initiating antibiotic therapy, and follow-up. NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best available evidence and explicit consideration of cost effectiveness. When minimal evidence is available, recommendations are based on the Guideline Committee’s experience and opinion of what constitutes good practice. Evidence levels for the recommendations are given in italic in square brackets. ### GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2452
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management—summary of updated NICE guidance

Lisa A. Boardman, Aye C. Paing, Linda Glennie, David P. J. Turner et al.
3 citations
BMJ
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
1.03
article

Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management—summary of updated NICE guidance

Lisa A. Boardman, Aye C. Paing, Linda Glennie, David P. J. Turner, Laura Elliff-O’Shea
article en
3 citations

Abstract

### What you need to know Bacterial meningitis and meningococcal disease are uncommon but life-threatening conditions. Early recognition is important but difficult because of the non-specific ways in which individuals present. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) initially published guidance on the conditions in 2010 and, after a surveillance review in 2018, updated it following changes in guideline development methodology and to reflect recent developments in vaccination.1 The 2024 guidance also extends the population of the original guideline from children only to including recommendations for adults.1 The term “bacterial meningitis” includes meningococcal meningitis without meningococcal sepsis and meningitis caused by other bacteria, while the term “meningococcal disease” includes meningococcal sepsis with or without meningococcal meningitis. Evidence for the two conditions was reviewed separately but considered in parallel. Whether separate recommendations were needed for each condition was decided based on the evidence and Guideline Committee’s experience. In this article, we summarise selected recommendations related to early recognition of these conditions, timing of investigations, initiating antibiotic therapy, and follow-up. NICE recommendations are based on systematic reviews of best available evidence and explicit consideration of cost effectiveness. When minimal evidence is available, recommendations are based on the Guideline Committee’s experience and opinion of what constitutes good practice. Evidence levels for the recommendations are given in italic in square brackets. ### GRADE Working Group grades of evidence

BMJVol. 387
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB), Meningitis Research Foundation (GB)
Department of Health and Social Care
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.