Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials

Abstract Lithium-ion batteries are pivotal in climate change mitigation. While their own carbon footprint raises concerns, existing studies are scattered, hard to compare and largely overlook the relevance of battery materials. Here, we go beyond traditional carbon footprint analysis and develop a cost-based approach, estimating emission curves for battery materials lithium, nickel and cobalt, based on mining cost data. Combining the emission curves with regionalised battery production announcements, we present carbon footprint distributions (5 th , 50 th , and 95 th percentiles) for lithium-ion batteries with nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC811, 8-1-1 ratio; 59, 74 and 115 kg CO2 kWh −1 ) and lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP; 54, 62, 69 kg CO2 kWh −1 ) cathodes. Our findings reveal the dominating impact of material sourcing over production location, with nickel and lithium identified as major contributors to the carbon footprint and its variance. This research moves the field forward by offering a nuanced understanding of battery carbon footprints, aiding in the design of decarbonisation policies and strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54634-y
Citations
74
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials

Vanessa Schenker, Stephan Pfister, Leopold Peiseler, Tobias S. Schmidt et al.
74 citations
Nature Communications
Extraction and Separation Processes
15.73
article

Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials

Vanessa Schenker, Stephan Pfister, Leopold Peiseler, Tobias S. Schmidt, Vanessa Wood, Karin Schatzmann
article en
74 citations

Abstract

Abstract Lithium-ion batteries are pivotal in climate change mitigation. While their own carbon footprint raises concerns, existing studies are scattered, hard to compare and largely overlook the relevance of battery materials. Here, we go beyond traditional carbon footprint analysis and develop a cost-based approach, estimating emission curves for battery materials lithium, nickel and cobalt, based on mining cost data. Combining the emission curves with regionalised battery production announcements, we present carbon footprint distributions (5 th , 50 th , and 95 th percentiles) for lithium-ion batteries with nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC811, 8-1-1 ratio; 59, 74 and 115 kg CO2 kWh −1 ) and lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP; 54, 62, 69 kg CO2 kWh −1 ) cathodes. Our findings reveal the dominating impact of material sourcing over production location, with nickel and lithium identified as major contributors to the carbon footprint and its variance. This research moves the field forward by offering a nuanced understanding of battery carbon footprints, aiding in the design of decarbonisation policies and strategies.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH)
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Extraction and Separation Processes
15.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.