Staffing rightsizing: analyzing staffing studies to inform potential rightsizing practices

Purpose A review of the literature on how academic library staffing is adjusted is especially relevant right now, as higher education is anticipating a large decline in college-age students matriculating into colleges and universities beginning in 2025. Academic libraries will be affected by these enrollment drops and will have to carefully consider how to support their institutions with smaller budgets and smaller staff sizes. This review will provide libraries with potential strategies to utilize as they consider how best to serve their users, both with changing demographics and continued changes in technology. Design/methodology/approach The literature on staffing in academic libraries was reviewed from the last 20 years in the context of relevance to rightsizing. Findings Findings show that there are studies looking at staffing trends over longer periods of time, analyses of particular areas (i.e. reference desks, technical services, etc.) to determine levels and types of staff needed (librarians, library staff or student workers), financial analyses of staffing, studies on outsourcing and a few studies on the dangers of downsizing. Research limitations/implications Since the research is limited to the library literature, the findings could potentially be limited. In addition, not all staffing studies were deemed relevant to the concept of rightsizing, so this study is not all inclusive. Originality/value There are many publications on staffing, but the researcher did not find a literature review of staffing studies from a rightsizing perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reference Services Review
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rsr-03-2024-0013
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Staffing rightsizing: analyzing staffing studies to inform potential rightsizing practices

Kathleen Baril
Reference Services Review
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Staffing rightsizing: analyzing staffing studies to inform potential rightsizing practices

Kathleen Baril
article en

Abstract

Purpose A review of the literature on how academic library staffing is adjusted is especially relevant right now, as higher education is anticipating a large decline in college-age students matriculating into colleges and universities beginning in 2025. Academic libraries will be affected by these enrollment drops and will have to carefully consider how to support their institutions with smaller budgets and smaller staff sizes. This review will provide libraries with potential strategies to utilize as they consider how best to serve their users, both with changing demographics and continued changes in technology. Design/methodology/approach The literature on staffing in academic libraries was reviewed from the last 20 years in the context of relevance to rightsizing. Findings Findings show that there are studies looking at staffing trends over longer periods of time, analyses of particular areas (i.e. reference desks, technical services, etc.) to determine levels and types of staff needed (librarians, library staff or student workers), financial analyses of staffing, studies on outsourcing and a few studies on the dangers of downsizing. Research limitations/implications Since the research is limited to the library literature, the findings could potentially be limited. In addition, not all staffing studies were deemed relevant to the concept of rightsizing, so this study is not all inclusive. Originality/value There are many publications on staffing, but the researcher did not find a literature review of staffing studies from a rightsizing perspective.

Reference Services Review
Ohio Northern University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.