Assessment of circulating tumor DNA in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy

Post-neoadjuvant therapy (post-NAT) and post-surgical circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) risk stratification may enhance the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of ctDNA-based MRD detection in LARC patients using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay. Plasma samples from LARC patients (N = 30) were analyzed retrospectively using the Signatera™ assay. The neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was calculated and compared to ctDNA status to predict recurrence risk and survival outcomes. ctDNA-positive patients post-NAT and post-surgery had worse Disease Free Survival (DFS) (HR: 7.82; p = 0.001, HR: 19.65; p = 0.001) when compared to ctDNA-negative patients. In the post-NAT setting, patients who responded to NAT had superior DFS compared to patients who did not clear their ctDNA or showed no radiological response (HR: 24.7, p = 0.001 and HR: 5.1, p = 0.054, respectively). When ctDNA status is used alongside the NAR score in the post-NAT setting, patients who were ctDNA-positive with an intermediate or high NAR score showed significantly worse DFS (HR: 47.5, p < 0.001) compared to ctDNA-negative patients with either a low or intermediate/high NAR score (HR: 9.8, p = 0.0301). Post-NAT ctDNA status, whether used alone or in combination with the NAR score, may predict NAT response, and improve risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80855-8
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of circulating tumor DNA in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy

Antonino Romeo, Adham Jurdi, Matteo Canale, Minetta C. Liu et al.
9 citations
Scientific Reports
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
2.57
article

Assessment of circulating tumor DNA in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy

Antonino Romeo, Adham Jurdi, Matteo Canale, Minetta C. Liu, Elisabetta Petracci, Giorgia Marisi, Punashi Dutta, Meenakshi Malhotra, Graziana Gallo, Giby V. George, Giacomo Feliciani, Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli, Margherita Muratore, Paola Ulivi, Andrea Prochowski Iamurri, Erik Spickard, Luca Saragoni, Giovanni Martinelli, George P. Laliotis, Chiara Molinari, Giovanni Luca Frassineti, Alessandro Passardi, Shruti Sharma
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Post-neoadjuvant therapy (post-NAT) and post-surgical circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) risk stratification may enhance the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of ctDNA-based MRD detection in LARC patients using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay. Plasma samples from LARC patients (N = 30) were analyzed retrospectively using the Signatera™ assay. The neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was calculated and compared to ctDNA status to predict recurrence risk and survival outcomes. ctDNA-positive patients post-NAT and post-surgery had worse Disease Free Survival (DFS) (HR: 7.82; p = 0.001, HR: 19.65; p = 0.001) when compared to ctDNA-negative patients. In the post-NAT setting, patients who responded to NAT had superior DFS compared to patients who did not clear their ctDNA or showed no radiological response (HR: 24.7, p = 0.001 and HR: 5.1, p = 0.054, respectively). When ctDNA status is used alongside the NAR score in the post-NAT setting, patients who were ctDNA-positive with an intermediate or high NAR score showed significantly worse DFS (HR: 47.5, p < 0.001) compared to ctDNA-negative patients with either a low or intermediate/high NAR score (HR: 9.8, p = 0.0301). Post-NAT ctDNA status, whether used alone or in combination with the NAR score, may predict NAT response, and improve risk stratification.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna (IT), Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena (IT), Natera (United States) (US), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Natera, Ministero della Salute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
2.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.