The effect of screening for publication bias on the outcomes of meta‐analyses

Abstract Conducting a meta‐analysis on a body of studies subject to publication bias is a type of post‐selection inference that may invalidate findings. Therefore, analysts often run a hypothesis test to check for publication bias prior to conducting a meta‐analysis. However, conducting meta‐analyses conditional on the outcome of such preliminary tests is itself a form of post‐selection inference. We investigate the effect on the outcome of a meta‐analysis of a null finding at the preliminary stage. We find that in many situations there is no or little bias in the findings at the main stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12762
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of screening for publication bias on the outcomes of meta‐analyses

Haben Michael
1 citations
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
0.46
article

The effect of screening for publication bias on the outcomes of meta‐analyses

Haben Michael
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Conducting a meta‐analysis on a body of studies subject to publication bias is a type of post‐selection inference that may invalidate findings. Therefore, analysts often run a hypothesis test to check for publication bias prior to conducting a meta‐analysis. However, conducting meta‐analyses conditional on the outcome of such preliminary tests is itself a form of post‐selection inference. We investigate the effect on the outcome of a meta‐analysis of a null finding at the preliminary stage. We find that in many situations there is no or little bias in the findings at the main stage.

Scandinavian Journal of StatisticsVol. 52(1)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.