Constructing Moral Autonomy

This study analyzes how local development leaders in Uganda navigate and evaluate the moral ambiguities of their work, as they are situated between the demands of donor-driven development systems and their communities’ growing mistrust of foreign aid. Using 54 context-rich interviews with development professionals in the central region of the country, I analyze the reflexive-constructive moral work they engage in to describe their activity; and I show how they construct a sense of their own moral autonomy by working across institutional sectors, diversifying funding sources, and framing their activities in personal and relational terms. I also show how specific characteristics of the four main arenas where they operate—the local government, NGO, religious, and business sectors—produce certain advantages and disadvantages in this process and shape their moral constructions. The study therefore speaks to the cultural impacts of international development aid, and how local actors find ways to challenge, adapt, and expand the moral cultures of “development” work.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology of Development
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2023.0019
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing Moral Autonomy

Nicolette D. Manglos‐Weber
Sociology of Development
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Constructing Moral Autonomy

Nicolette D. Manglos‐Weber
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes how local development leaders in Uganda navigate and evaluate the moral ambiguities of their work, as they are situated between the demands of donor-driven development systems and their communities’ growing mistrust of foreign aid. Using 54 context-rich interviews with development professionals in the central region of the country, I analyze the reflexive-constructive moral work they engage in to describe their activity; and I show how they construct a sense of their own moral autonomy by working across institutional sectors, diversifying funding sources, and framing their activities in personal and relational terms. I also show how specific characteristics of the four main arenas where they operate—the local government, NGO, religious, and business sectors—produce certain advantages and disadvantages in this process and shape their moral constructions. The study therefore speaks to the cultural impacts of international development aid, and how local actors find ways to challenge, adapt, and expand the moral cultures of “development” work.

Sociology of DevelopmentVol. 11(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.