The BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem: Characteristics, challenges, benefits, and opportunities

In this paper, we provide an overview and analysis of the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem. First, we compare and contrast the characteristics of the seven BRAIN Initiative data archives germane to data sharing and reuse, namely data submission and access procedures and aspects of interoperability. Second, we discuss challenges, benefits, and future opportunities, focusing on issues largely specific to sharing human data and drawing on <i>N</i> = 34 interviews with diverse stakeholders. The BRAIN Initiative-funded archive ecosystem faces interoperability and data stewardship challenges, such as achieving and maintaining interoperability of data and archives and harmonizing research participants' informed consents for tiers of access for human data across multiple archives. Yet, a benefit of this distributed archive ecosystem is the ability of more specialized archives to adapt to the needs of particular research communities. Finally, the multiple archives offer ample raw material for network evolution in response to the needs of neuroscientists over time. Our first objective in this paper is to provide a guide to the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem for readers interested in sharing and reusing neuroscience data. Second, our analysis supports the development of empirically informed policy and practice aimed at making neuroscience data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eLife
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.94000
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem: Characteristics, challenges, benefits, and opportunities

Kathryn Maxson Jones, Mary A. Majumder, Gabriel Lázaro‐Muñoz, Jill O. Robinson et al.
4 citations
eLife
Research Data Management Practices
3.12
article

The BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem: Characteristics, challenges, benefits, and opportunities

Kathryn Maxson Jones, Mary A. Majumder, Gabriel Lázaro‐Muñoz, Jill O. Robinson, Sudhanvan Iyer, Dominique Duncan, Amy L. McGuire, Nicole R. Provenza, Sameer A. Sheth
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an overview and analysis of the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem. First, we compare and contrast the characteristics of the seven BRAIN Initiative data archives germane to data sharing and reuse, namely data submission and access procedures and aspects of interoperability. Second, we discuss challenges, benefits, and future opportunities, focusing on issues largely specific to sharing human data and drawing on <i>N</i> = 34 interviews with diverse stakeholders. The BRAIN Initiative-funded archive ecosystem faces interoperability and data stewardship challenges, such as achieving and maintaining interoperability of data and archives and harmonizing research participants' informed consents for tiers of access for human data across multiple archives. Yet, a benefit of this distributed archive ecosystem is the ability of more specialized archives to adapt to the needs of particular research communities. Finally, the multiple archives offer ample raw material for network evolution in response to the needs of neuroscientists over time. Our first objective in this paper is to provide a guide to the BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem for readers interested in sharing and reusing neuroscience data. Second, our analysis supports the development of empirically informed policy and practice aimed at making neuroscience data more findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.

eLifeVol. 13
University of Southern California (US), Harvard University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Center for Practical Bioethics (US)
Robert and Janice McNair Foundation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Purdue University, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Research Data Management Practices
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.