Monitoring the Dynamic Vertical Clearance under the Laviolette Bridge on the St. Lawrence River

Internationally, the size of vessels keeps increasing. This causes a problem for the merchant navy, as many obstacles can limit the passage of larger vessels. When a ship sets sail for the Port of Montreal, the Laviolette Bridge near Trois-Rivières is the main aerial obstacle. It is why the Montreal Port Authority with Québec’s Ministry of Transportation’s authorization and collaboration launched the Laviolette Bridge monitoring project. The purpose of this monitoring was to analyze the variation of the vertical clearance under the bridge for a year. To achieve this, four global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers/antennas, a laser rangefinder, a radar rangefinder, and a weather station were installed on the bridge. These instruments helped to quantify the bridge’s movement as driven by factors such as wind, temperature, and traffic, as well as their impact on the vertical clearance. The results presented in this paper show that the temperature difference between winter and summer causes altimetric variations of up to 6 cm at the top of the bridge and 3 cm at the deck level. The water level fluctuations of the St. Lawrence River are by far the most significant factor. It varies up to approximately 3 m at the location of the Laviolette bridge due to seasonal fluctuations. Two independent vertical clearance models were developed and compared. The first one considers that the bridge has a fixed height and that only the water level varies. The second model uses the radar rangefinder installed under the bridge to measure vertical clearances that account for the movements of the bridge. In general, the two models agree within a few cm, and this difference slightly varies according to the seasons. By applying a thermal correction to the first model, the gap between the two models is reduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsued2.sueng-1511
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring the Dynamic Vertical Clearance under the Laviolette Bridge on the St. Lawrence River

Marc Cocard, Stéphanie Bourgon, Christian Larouche, Maxime Corbin
1 citations
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
0.46
article

Monitoring the Dynamic Vertical Clearance under the Laviolette Bridge on the St. Lawrence River

Marc Cocard, Stéphanie Bourgon, Christian Larouche, Maxime Corbin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Internationally, the size of vessels keeps increasing. This causes a problem for the merchant navy, as many obstacles can limit the passage of larger vessels. When a ship sets sail for the Port of Montreal, the Laviolette Bridge near Trois-Rivières is the main aerial obstacle. It is why the Montreal Port Authority with Québec’s Ministry of Transportation’s authorization and collaboration launched the Laviolette Bridge monitoring project. The purpose of this monitoring was to analyze the variation of the vertical clearance under the bridge for a year. To achieve this, four global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers/antennas, a laser rangefinder, a radar rangefinder, and a weather station were installed on the bridge. These instruments helped to quantify the bridge’s movement as driven by factors such as wind, temperature, and traffic, as well as their impact on the vertical clearance. The results presented in this paper show that the temperature difference between winter and summer causes altimetric variations of up to 6 cm at the top of the bridge and 3 cm at the deck level. The water level fluctuations of the St. Lawrence River are by far the most significant factor. It varies up to approximately 3 m at the location of the Laviolette bridge due to seasonal fluctuations. Two independent vertical clearance models were developed and compared. The first one considers that the bridge has a fixed height and that only the water level varies. The second model uses the radar rangefinder installed under the bridge to measure vertical clearances that account for the movements of the bridge. In general, the two models agree within a few cm, and this difference slightly varies according to the seasons. By applying a thermal correction to the first model, the gap between the two models is reduced.

Journal of Surveying EngineeringVol. 151(1)
3v Geomatics (Canada) (CA), Centre de Géomatique du Québec (CA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.