Have we really benefited from integrating blended learning in higher education programs after COVID-19? Jordan as a case study

The study explores the impact of integrating blended learning (asynchronous/synchronous) on the learning of students in higher education programs in Jordan, such as sciences and humanities, from the perspective of the professors. The study also examines whether there is a statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the level of using blended learning for student learning concerning the sciences or humanities programs. In addition, the study also explores whether there is a statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the level of using blended learning on student learning concerning gender. The study also highlights the main challenges that higher education instructors face when applying blended learning to their programs. Data is collected by using the quantitative method. A questionnaire was answered by 380 instructors that teach in the sciences and humanities programs of higher institutions. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The instructors were asked to state their challenges during the implementation of blended learning in their courses. The findings show that instructors who teach humanities programs are more satisfied than instructors who teach science programs. The study contributes to the aim of the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Jordan to increase the percentage of blended courses for all higher education programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2431788
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Have we really benefited from integrating blended learning in higher education programs after COVID-19? Jordan as a case study

Mohamed Haffar, Nasaybah Walid Awajan, Khalil Al‐Hyari, Nibal Malkawi
1 citations
Cogent Education
Online and Blended Learning
2.10
article

Have we really benefited from integrating blended learning in higher education programs after COVID-19? Jordan as a case study

Mohamed Haffar, Nasaybah Walid Awajan, Khalil Al‐Hyari, Nibal Malkawi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The study explores the impact of integrating blended learning (asynchronous/synchronous) on the learning of students in higher education programs in Jordan, such as sciences and humanities, from the perspective of the professors. The study also examines whether there is a statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the level of using blended learning for student learning concerning the sciences or humanities programs. In addition, the study also explores whether there is a statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) in the level of using blended learning on student learning concerning gender. The study also highlights the main challenges that higher education instructors face when applying blended learning to their programs. Data is collected by using the quantitative method. A questionnaire was answered by 380 instructors that teach in the sciences and humanities programs of higher institutions. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The instructors were asked to state their challenges during the implementation of blended learning in their courses. The findings show that instructors who teach humanities programs are more satisfied than instructors who teach science programs. The study contributes to the aim of the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Jordan to increase the percentage of blended courses for all higher education programs.

Cogent EducationVol. 11(1)
Al-Balqa Applied University (JO), University of Birmingham (GB), Middle East University (JO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Online and Blended Learning
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.