What does a consent conversation for whole genome sequencing look like in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service? An observational study

Patient choice consent for whole genome sequencing (WGS) through the Genomic Medicine Service in England covers consent to diagnostic testing and an invitation to the National Genomic Research Library (NGRL). Little is known about what consent conversations for WGS look like in practice. We audio-recorded and analysed the content and structure of consent appointments (n = 26) between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents of children with rare disease across seven NHS Trusts. Appointments frequently covered the potential findings from testing, implications for family members, and DNA storage, but often omitted that data may be reanalysed in the future if a diagnosis is not made. Consent to the NGRL was typically sought during the same appointment; these discussions varied in content, but frequently included a background to the NGRL and data security. HCPs often tempered expectations around what WGS can achieve and asked questions to clarify parents' understanding, but less commonly elicited parents' values and concerns. Administrative tasks were time-consuming, but took less time when consent was recorded digitally. Future training should emphasise how to elicit patients' values and concerns. Digital infrastructure and hiring roles such as genomic associates to support consent may be important strategies to meet the workload demands of WGS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-024-01749-x
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What does a consent conversation for whole genome sequencing look like in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service? An observational study

Saskia C. Sanderson, Huda Alfardus, Celine Lewis, Holly Ellard
7 citations
European Journal of Human Genetics
Genomics and Rare Diseases
3.85
article

What does a consent conversation for whole genome sequencing look like in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service? An observational study

Saskia C. Sanderson, Huda Alfardus, Celine Lewis, Holly Ellard
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Patient choice consent for whole genome sequencing (WGS) through the Genomic Medicine Service in England covers consent to diagnostic testing and an invitation to the National Genomic Research Library (NGRL). Little is known about what consent conversations for WGS look like in practice. We audio-recorded and analysed the content and structure of consent appointments (n = 26) between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents of children with rare disease across seven NHS Trusts. Appointments frequently covered the potential findings from testing, implications for family members, and DNA storage, but often omitted that data may be reanalysed in the future if a diagnosis is not made. Consent to the NGRL was typically sought during the same appointment; these discussions varied in content, but frequently included a background to the NGRL and data security. HCPs often tempered expectations around what WGS can achieve and asked questions to clarify parents' understanding, but less commonly elicited parents' values and concerns. Administrative tasks were time-consuming, but took less time when consent was recorded digitally. Future training should emphasise how to elicit patients' values and concerns. Digital infrastructure and hiring roles such as genomic associates to support consent may be important strategies to meet the workload demands of WGS.

European Journal of Human GeneticsVol. 33(4)
King's College London (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Mental Health Research UK (GB), PHG Foundation (GB), Genomics (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
3.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.