Magnetization transfer explains most variablity of T1-estimates in the MRI literature

Motivation: T1-estimates vary substantially throughout the literature. Goal(s): To provide evidence that magnetization transfer (MT) explains most of this variability. Approach: We simulated 16 literature T1-mapping approaches with an MT model and fitted a T1-value to each simulated dataset. We then modified a global set of MT parameters to best explain the T1-variability. Results: We found that MT explains 71% of the literature's T1-variability. The largest reduction and minimal Bayesian and Akaike information criteria were achieved when incorporating two recent advances in MT modeling: describing the semi-solid pool's spin dynamics with the generalized Bloch model and removing commonly-used constraints on the semi-solid pool's T1. Impact: Our results suggest that T1 should be considered a semi-quantitative metric in biological tissue, meaning comparisons between different T1-mapping methods and validations in doped-water phantoms are of limited value.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/0571
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetization transfer explains most variablity of T1-estimates in the MRI literature

Jakob Assländer
Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Magnetization transfer explains most variablity of T1-estimates in the MRI literature

Jakob Assländer
article en

Abstract

Motivation: T1-estimates vary substantially throughout the literature. Goal(s): To provide evidence that magnetization transfer (MT) explains most of this variability. Approach: We simulated 16 literature T1-mapping approaches with an MT model and fitted a T1-value to each simulated dataset. We then modified a global set of MT parameters to best explain the T1-variability. Results: We found that MT explains 71% of the literature's T1-variability. The largest reduction and minimal Bayesian and Akaike information criteria were achieved when incorporating two recent advances in MT modeling: describing the semi-solid pool's spin dynamics with the generalized Bloch model and removing commonly-used constraints on the semi-solid pool's T1. Impact: Our results suggest that T1 should be considered a semi-quantitative metric in biological tissue, meaning comparisons between different T1-mapping methods and validations in doped-water phantoms are of limited value.

Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.